Liboff: A decent undergrad textbook?

  • Thread starter Thread starter physicist311
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook Undergrad
AI Thread Summary
Introductory Quantum Mechanics by Liboff (4th ed.) receives mixed reviews among physics undergraduates. Some users find it a solid resource, noting its comprehensive material, but caution that its non-standard organization may require following a course syllabus closely. In contrast, many recommend Griffiths' book as a superior choice for beginners due to its clarity and better physical motivation, making it more suitable for self-study. Shankar's text is also mentioned favorably for its self-contained nature. Overall, the consensus leans towards Griffiths as the preferred option for students new to quantum mechanics, with Liboff viewed as merely acceptable.
physicist311
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
At our university we use Introductory Quantum Mechanics by Liboff 4th ed. What are your opinions on that book? I write this as a physics undergrad going to take QM next spring and looking for a decent well explained QM book to study over the summer. I also have a strong math background in Calc, ODE's, and Linear Algebra. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I used Liboff as an undergrad and I think it is a very good book. The organization is non-standard, so it would be good to use a course syllabus as a guide (I would guess that the syllabus will do some jumping between chapters).
 
confinement, how would you compare it to other books like Griffiths and Shankar?
 
I didn't really care for Liboff. It has maybe a bit more material than Shankar, but not as much physical motivation. Shankar is also much more self-contained and conducive to self-study.
 
I am reading forums time to time, but i was not a member up to now. I just registered to say this;

stay away from liboff in any case. griffiths' book is far way better than it. Shankar is a good book, too. Griffiths' book is a good start, though.
 
Thanks Bozon. Since I first posted the topic, I have been talking to other students and grad students around the physics dept. about Liboff. Most agreed it was an OK book at best. Also, many told me that Griffiths is the best for a student first entering QM. So I think I will study Griffiths this summer. To everybody who replied: thanks for the help.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
5K
Back
Top