Lie derivative of covariant vector

zardiac
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Derive L_v(u_a)=v^b \partial_b u_a + u_b \partial_a v^b


Homework Equations


L_v(w^a)=v^b \partial_b w^a - w^b \partial_b v^a

L_v(f)=v^a \partial_a f where f is a scalar.

The Attempt at a Solution


In the end I get stuck with something like this,
L_v(u_a)w^a=v^b u_a \partial_b w^a -u_a v^b \partial_b w^a +v^b w ^a \partial_b u_a +u_a w^b \partial_b v^a
Which makes me think I am on the right way, but I end up with
L_v(u_a)w^a=v^b w ^a \partial_b u_a +u_a w^b \partial_b v^a

Which is what I want if I can change place of a and b in the last term only. But I am not allowed to do that just like that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zardiac said:
Which is what I want if I can change place of a and b in the last term only. But I am not allowed to do that just like that right?

Of course you are. There's no significance to what letter you use to represent the sums. u^a v_a = u^b v_b = u^\Upsilon v_\Upsilon all mean exactly the same thing.
 
Really? I guess I am not used to the einstein notation contention. How can you see what indexes are free and which ones are dummy?
I thought since I was to determine L_v(u_a) then a was a free index, and thus if I change in one of the terms I have to change in all of the terms. (Which would not lead to the correct result in this case)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top