Lift and Drag from Pressure Distribution over an Air Foil

AI Thread Summary
Calculating lift and drag from pressure distribution over an airfoil is complex, as it involves understanding both static and dynamic pressure. While lift and induced drag can be determined, skin friction or parasitic drag presents challenges due to its dependence on the boundary layer characteristics. The shear boundary layer can thicken and transition from laminar to turbulent flow, affecting the effective shape of the airfoil. Accurate pressure distribution measurement may require instrumentation that could impact airflow. Simplified models often rely on the Navier-Stokes equations to analyze these forces effectively.
Triggers12
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Pretty simple question:

Is it possible to completely calculate Lift and Drag from the pressure distribution over an airfoil?

Atm, I have Lift worked out as well as the Induced drag ( correct me if I'm wrong. ) but am having trouble working out how it would be possible to get the skin friction / parasitic drag.

Thanks for your help!
Trigs
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Triggers12 said:
Is it possible to completely calculate Lift and Drag from the pressure distribution over an airfoil?
How would you determine the pressure distribution over an airfoil? Perhaps some form of intrumentation, but that would have some effect on the flow. A simplified model could use static pressure distribuition and the normals (line perpendicular) to the sections of surface of a wing, but there are other factors. Static pressure isn't directional, but dynamic pressure and any related changes in momentum of the air are directional. Skin friction is nearly parallel to a wing surface. The shear boundary layer thickens over time, may detach and reattach as it transitions from laminar to turbulent, so that changes the effective air foil shape.

The best mathematical models for lift and drag are usually based on some simplified form of Navier Stokes equations:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier–Stokes_equations
 
Last edited:
rcgldr said:
How would you determine the pressure distributaion over an airfoil? Perhaps some form of intrumentation, but that would have some effect on the flow. A simplified model could use static pressure distribuition and the normals (line perpendicular) to the sections of surface of a wing, but there are other factors. Static pressure isn't directional, but dynamic pressure and any related changes in momentum of the air are directional. Skin friction is nearly parallel to a wing surface. The shear boundary layer thickens over time, may detach and reattach as it transitions from laminar to turbulent, so that changes the effective air foil shape.

The best mathematical models for lift and drag are usually based on some simplified form of Navier Stokes equations:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier–Stokes_equations

Hey thanks for the response,

Trigs
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Similar threads

I Drag equation - relative flow velocity
Replies
11
Views
3K
How calculate lift/drag using static pressure taps in wind tunnel test?
Replies
9
Views
3K
B If the source of the pressure distribution around a lifting airfoil is known, why is not explained in textbooks?
Replies
23
Views
1K
Drag formula used to calculate bullet hole depth?
Replies
19
Views
4K
Gravity, Air Friction, Drag, 50, 60, 70, 100 miles up?
Replies
6
Views
1K
Finding distance travelled with drag
Replies
17
Views
8K
Validity of rocket pressure thrust term
Replies
11
Views
4K
Need help trying to mimic a phenomenon associated with air pressure
Replies
1
Views
2K
Lift: Probably my last question
Replies
7
Views
2K
Why do air foils produce lift?
Replies
38
Views
6K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top