Light and electric charge constant?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the invariance of electric charge and its relation to other physical constants, particularly in the context of relativity. Peter Bergmann's assertion that a body's electric charge remains constant for all observers prompts questions about whether this is coincidental, similar to the invariance of the speed of light and spacetime intervals. Participants explore the concept of four-vectors, such as four-momentum, which maintain invariant properties across different reference frames. The conversation also touches on the invariant nature of charge density and the complexities involved in proving these invariances. Overall, the inquiry seeks a deeper understanding of the fundamental constants and their relationships within the framework of relativistic physics.
Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
Peter Bergmann (a student of Einsteins) in THE RIDDLE OF GRAVITATION, PAGE 60 notes

... a bodies electric charge has the same value for all observers,...

And here I had been thinking only about the speed of light as invarient.
Is the above coincidence?? I can't tell...

and the space time interval, is also invarient, right??

Are there other entities constant for all observers? Yes, I think four vectors such as "four vector momentum" which in simple terms is E2 - p2 that is (energy)2 - (momentum)2...

I realize these transform (from one reference frame to another) as they do because of the mathematics of the formulations themselves, and the way they fit into relativity, but I can't help wondering if there is any deeper explanation or understanding. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Naty1 said:
Are there other entities constant for all observers? Yes, I think four vectors such as "four vector momentum" which in simple terms is E2 - p2 that is (energy)2 - (momentum)2...
The norm of four-momentum that you mention is the invariant mass (aka rest mass) which is the same for all observers.

I don't know about charge, I would guess that you could set up a current vector and then charge would be the timelike component, but then that wouldn't go along with Bergmann's comment. There must be some other four-vector that has charge as the norm. I actually haven't done much in the way of relativistic EM.
 
The total charge of an object is \int\rho d^3 r. It is shown in advanced textbooks that this integral is invariant. It is a tricky proof.
 
Naty1 said:
Peter Bergmann (a student of Einsteins) in THE RIDDLE OF GRAVITATION, PAGE 60 notes



And here I had been thinking only about the speed of light as invarient.
Is the above coincidence?? I can't tell...

and the space time interval, is also invarient, right??

Are there other entities constant for all observers? Yes, I think four vectors such as "four vector momentum" which in simple terms is E2 - p2 that is (energy)2 - (momentum)2...

I realize these transform (from one reference frame to another) as they do because of the mathematics of the formulations themselves, and the way they fit into relativity, but I can't help wondering if there is any deeper explanation or understanding. Any ideas?
This is how I understand it (but I'm not sure at all to be correct): take a scalar quantity which depends on the frame of reference, e.g. energy, time difference between events, frequency, ecc., then take a vectorial quantity which depends on the frame of reference and that is related with the first (there exist an equation which involve both) example: energy and momentum or time difference and spatial distance, frequency and wave vector, ecc. Then there must exist a four-vector made with that scalar and that vectorial quantity, which square modulus is invariant, because for the relativity principle, all frames of reference must be equivalent, so the above equation must be valid in every of them. All 4-vectors have this property.

Example: if in a frame of ref. S you find: (c*delta t)^2 = 1.5 + (delta x)^2 + (delta y)^2 + (delta z)^2 then you also have to find: (c*delta t')^2 = 1.5 + (delta x')^2 + (delta y')^2 + (delta z')^2 in another frame of ref. S' , so if you write (c*delta t)^2 - (delta x)^2 + (delta y)^2 + (delta z)^2 you have found an invariant quantity because it's always = 1.5

An intriguing (for me) invariant quantity is Phase. I'd like to know which is the 4-vector which square modulus is the phase.
 
Last edited:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 230 ·
8
Replies
230
Views
21K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K