Light hitting a superconductor?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the transparency of superconductors to X-rays when cooled to their superconducting state. Participants question whether X-rays can penetrate superconductors, considering that ordinary metals are already opaque to X-rays due to their interaction with free electrons. It is noted that while conducting materials generally attenuate electromagnetic radiation, this effect may diminish at high frequencies like X-rays. The conversation raises the possibility that superconductors might behave differently, potentially allowing X-rays to pass through as if they were transparent. The inquiry emphasizes the need for further research into the interaction between X-rays and superconducting materials.
cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3
can x-rays go through a superconductor when it cooled down to its superconducting state.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Er.. if it does, then diagnostic techniques such as x-ray photoemission, x-ray diffraction, x-ray scattering, etc. will be useless for superconductors. You can do a search for yourself how many papers have been published in the study of superconductivity using such techniques.

Here's a question you should ask yourself: if x-rays have a tough time passing through ordinary metals, why would it pass through something that is an even better conductor?

Zz.
 
ok that's a good point. ill do some research on it .
 
Do superconductivity alters the X-ray transparency of a material?

If i remember correctly, conducting materials are opaque to EM radiation because the EM field interacts with the free electrons, losing energy during this process, and so the field gets weaker (attenuated) as it enters the material. If it were thick enough, we can say (almost) no EM radiation passes through it. Also, the more conducting the material, more attenuated the EM radiation is. So, we would conclude that a superconductor, which has zero resistivity, would be a perfect shield for EM radiation.

But if i remember correctly, this effect somehow stops working at very high frequencies (like X-rays or gamma rays), because the electrons are not "fast enough" to interact (and thus to absorb energy) from the EM radiation, and so it passes through the material as if were transparent.

So, my question is, do this also happens with a superconductor? Is it as transparent to X-rays as it would be if it were not a superconductor?
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top