Light Interference Wave Equation - Assumption

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding the light interference wave equation, specifically regarding the assumption that allows the cosine term to be ignored. The key point is that this reduction occurs when k(x1+x2)/2 equals ωt, and participants clarify the relationship between wave parameters k and ω. A significant aspect of the conversation involves averaging y^2 over time to determine the intensity of light in a photograph, emphasizing that constant phase terms in the cosine function do not affect the average. The participants also discuss the method for averaging periodic functions, suggesting that selecting an appropriate time interval is crucial for accurate results. Overall, the thread highlights the mathematical principles behind light intensity in wave equations and the averaging process involved.
elemis
Messages
162
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


yyi6scl2cn6c9au4g.jpg

Homework Equations



In question.

The Attempt at a Solution



To be clear it's part (vi) that's unclear to me.

In order to ignore the cosine term it has to reduce to 1. This can happen, only if k(x1+x2)/2 = ωt

Is this a correct assumption ?

Also, it is known that k = 2∏/λ and ω=2∏/T

However, I'm trying to think in what way these two components could be equal but I can't get it.

Could someone give me some help, please ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For a long exposure, you average y^2 over time - the constant phase in the cosine does not matter for the average.
 
mfb said:
For a long exposure, you average y^2 over time - the constant phase in the cosine does not matter for the average.

I really don't understand what you mean. Could you please break it down for me ?

I really do appreciate you taking the time out to help me.
 
A photograph collects light over a period of time.
The lightness in the photo depends on the intensity of the incoming light and the time of the exposure.

He's telling you to find y^2, then average it over time.
This gives you a function of position alone - which will be what the photograph shows.
When you do this - the terms you are worried about will cancel out.

Do you know what y=?
Do you know how to square a function?
Do you know how to average a function?
 
Simon Bridge said:
A photograph collects light over a period of time.
The lightness in the photo depends on the intensity of the incoming light and the time of the exposure.

He's telling you to find y^2, then average it over time.
This gives you a function of position alone - which will be what the photograph shows.
When you do this - the terms you are worried about will cancel out.

Do you know what y=?
Do you know how to square a function?
Do you know how to average a function?

I can do the first two but not the last one. How do I average a function over time ?

EDIT: Why do I need to find y^2 ? Is it because intensity is directly proportional to Amplitude^2 ?
 
Did you read the links? The second one tells how to handle the average of a periodic function - what does it say to do?
 
Simon Bridge said:
Did you read the links? The second one tells how to handle the average of a periodic function - what does it say to do?

I've carried out the steps for the time average for cos2x for limits 0 to T.

I've gotten : \frac{1}{T}[\frac{1}{2}T+\frac{1}{4}sin2T]

What do I choose to be T in this case ? Infinity ?
 
  • #10
But it is not exactly cos2x that you have to average is it? x(t)=?

The trick with time averaging square trig-functions is to choose your interval carefully - if you let T be any integer number of quarter cycles, the average will make sense easily. I usually pick a singe period for T.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/math/defint.html (3rd panel down)
 
Back
Top