Light waves, photons; sound waves, phonons; water waves, hydrons ?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the analogy between different types of waves and their associated quantum particles, specifically focusing on light waves (photons), sound waves (phonons), and the proposed concept of water waves being associated with "hydrons" or "ripplons." Participants explore the behavior of these waves and the feasibility of creating a water laser based on these particles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that if light waves are made of photons and sound waves of phonons, then water waves might be made of "hydrons," questioning their behavior and the possibility of a water laser.
  • Another participant corrects the term "hydrons" to "ripplons," defining ripplons as quantized capillary-tension waves at the surface of a liquid.
  • A humorous response suggests that the concept of a water laser is akin to using "squirt guns."
  • A participant expresses difficulty in finding accessible information on ripplons and requests suggestions for introductory resources.
  • Discussion includes the relationship between long-wavelength surface waves, gravity, and surface tension, with references to capillary waves and their manifestation in superfluid helium.
  • One participant draws a parallel between the modeling challenges of gravitons and water waves, suggesting that studying water waves might provide insights into gravity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views regarding the terminology and concepts related to water waves and their quantum counterparts. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the feasibility of a water laser or the implications of ripplons.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of wave types and their associated particles, as well as unresolved aspects regarding the modeling of gravitons and their relationship to water waves.

jetwaterluffy
Messages
227
Reaction score
0
Light waves, photons; sound waves, phonons; water waves, "hydrons"?

Light waves are made of photons; sound waves are made of phonons; so are water waves made of "hydrons", and if so, how would they behave, and would it be possible to make a water laser or something similar based on these particles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


They're called "ripplons".

ripplon n. A quantized capillary-tension wave at the surface of a liquid
 


jetwaterluffy said:
...and would it be possible to make a water laser or something similar...

We used to call them "squirt guns".

:smile:
 


DrChinese said:
We used to call them "squirt guns".

:smile:

:biggrin:
Yep, that's what I meant.
I actually meant a laser within the medium, not of the medium. The light version of what you described would be a cathode ray, not a laser.
Thanks for the name, Bill. I tried searching "ripplon" and couldn't find anything acessable. Do you have any suggestions of any sites which might give an introdution to them?
 


jetwaterluffy, Long-wavelength surface waves are driven by gravity, but as the wavelength gets shorter the effect of gravity becomes less important, and the waves are driven instead by surface tension (see "capillary wave" in Wikipedia). Quantized surface waves ("ripplons") are of this sort, and manifest themselves primarily in superfluid He, either on films or on the surface of bulk helium. I can only find this http://arxiv.org/abs/1003.4709" online that talks about the subject, but it's pretty high powered.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Spinnor


Bill_K said:
jetwaterluffy, Long-wavelength surface waves are driven by gravity, but as the wavelength gets shorter the effect of gravity becomes less important, and the waves are driven instead by surface tension (see "capillary wave" in Wikipedia).

Yeah, I was thinking about this earlier when I was reading a quantum gravity book. It said gravitons were hard to model because of turbulence at high amplitudes and wavelengths. I thought, just like water waves. It also said the gravitons would affect themselves because they affect anything with energy. I thought, water waves are like this too, as their wavelength depends on depth, which they themselves affect. They said it was hard to model gravitons that are not made of short wavelengths and amplitudes. Now, from looking at your post, it appears ripplons are like this too. So maybe studying water waves might tell them something about gravity. This, with the idea of making a water laser, is what got me interested in "hydrons" to start with.
Thanks for the explanation and the paper!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K