Line charge density expressed via Dirac delta function

Heirot
Messages
145
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let's say we have a wire of finite length L with total charge Q evenly spread along the wire so that lambda=Q/L, linear charge density, is constant. The wire is shaped in x-y plane in some well behaved curve y = f(x). Find the surface charge density sigma(x,y).

Homework Equations



Q = Int(lambda dl) = Int ( Sqrt(1+(dy/dx)^2) dx) for line charge density
Q = Int(sigma(x,y) dx dy) for surface charge density

The Attempt at a Solution



The most logic thing to do would be to write sigma(x,y) = lambda * delta(y-f(x)), where delta(x) is Dirac's delta function. Unfortunately, this doesn't give the right Q, because integration of the delta function over y only give 1 and not the required Sqrt(1+(dy/dx)^2).

Where's the error in reasoning?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
But

<br /> \begin{equation*}<br /> \begin{split}<br /> Q &amp;= \lambda L \\<br /> &amp;= \lambda \int \sqrt{1 + \left( \frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2} dx.<br /> \end{split}<br /> \end{equation*}<br />

Heuristically, the amount of charge on the wire between x and x + dx is

dQ = \lambda dL = \lambda \sqrt{1 + \left( \frac{dy}{dx}\right)^2} dx.
 
Last edited:
I agree. So, dQ = sigma(x,y) dx dy. What's sigma(x,y)?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top