Linear Acceleration of a Bicycle with Changing Wheel Rotation

AI Thread Summary
To find the linear acceleration of a bicycle with wheels of 0.600 m diameter, the problem involves converting wheel rotation from RPM to radians per second and calculating angular acceleration. The bicycle's wheel rotation increases from 215 RPM to 275 RPM over 24.3 seconds. The relationship between angular speed and linear speed is crucial for determining linear acceleration. The discussion highlights the need to compute the distance traveled per revolution to connect angular and linear motion. Understanding these relationships is key to solving the problem accurately.
fruitl00p
Messages
93
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A bicycle has wheels with a diameter of .600 m. It accelerates uniformly and the rate of rotation of its wheels increases from 215rpm to 275rpm in a time of 24.3 seconds. Find the linear acceleration of bicycle.

Homework Equations


w =wi + alpha(time)



The Attempt at a Solution



I obviously don't know what I am doing. First I tried converting the rpms into rads/s. Then I used the new angular velocities to find the angular acceleration. However I then tried to find the linear acceleration by finding the a(tan) and a(rad) and finding the magnitude from these values. But I was wrong!

Unfortunately I do not know what the answer is, but if anyone can steer me in the proper direction, that would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: How far does the Bicycle move each revolution?
 
so...I find theta in order to find the linear acceleration?
 
There's a very direct relation between the angular speed in rpms of the wheels and the linear speed of the bicycle. Can you find it?
 
oh, I understand now dick! Thank you.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top