Linear algebra. invertible matrix and its eigenvalue

mcbonov
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let A be an invertible matrix.
show that if λ is an eigenvalue of A,
then 1/λ is an eigenvalue of A^-1


PLEASE HELP ME .
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mcbonov said:

Homework Statement



Let A be an invertible matrix.
show that if λ is an eigenvalue of A,
then 1/λ is an eigenvalue of A^-1


PLEASE HELP ME .
Thank you.

You're new here (welcome to Physics Forums!) so you probably haven't had a chance to check out the rules. Before we can provide any help, you need to show an effort at the problem you're posting.

When you're working proofs such as these, it's crucial that you have the definitions of the terms being used.

For example, what does it mean that A is an invertible matrix?
What does it mean that λ is an eigenvalue of A?
What's another way of saying that 1/λ is an eigenvalue of A-1?
 
i tried Ax =λx
(Ax-λx)=0
(A-λ)x=0 since x is not a zero vector
A-λ=0 then A=λ

THEN A^-1 = λ^-1
so (A^-1)x = (λ^-1)x

I basically don't know how to prove...
I don't think the above is near to correct answer.
that's the most I can do ...
how can i solve this problem??
 
mcbonov said:
i tried Ax =λx
(Ax-λx)=0
(A-λ)x=0 since x is not a zero vector
No, you can't say this. A is a matrix, but λ is a scalar. You can't subtract a scalar from a matrix. What you can say is this:
(A-λI)x=0, for some nonzero vector x (an eigenvector of the eigenvalue λ).
mcbonov said:
A-λ=0 then A=λ
Makes no sense, since A and λ are two completely different kinds of things.
mcbonov said:
THEN A^-1 = λ^-1
so (A^-1)x = (λ^-1)x

I basically don't know how to prove...
I don't think the above is near to correct answer.
that's the most I can do ...
how can i solve this problem??

You know that Ax =λx for some nonzero vector x. You also know that A is invertible. What happens if you multiply both sides of the equation, on the left, by A-1.

Keep in mind what you would like to end up with, that would imply that 1/λ is an eigenvalue of A-1.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top