[Linear Algebra] solution to A^TCAx=f

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
Dafe
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


With conductances [tex]c_{1}=1, c_{2}=c_{3}=2[/tex], multiply matrices to find
[tex]A^TCAx = f[/tex].
For [tex]f = (1,0,-1)[/tex] find a solution to [tex]A^TCAx = f[/tex].
Write the potentials [tex]x[/tex] and currents [tex]y = -CAx[/tex] on the triangle graph, when the current source [tex]f[/tex] goes into node 1 and out from node 3.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex] A^TCA = <br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 3 & -1 & -2 \\ -1 & 3 & -2 \\ -2 & -2 & 4 \\ \end{array} \right]<br /> [/tex]

After elimination I get:

[tex] A^TCA = <br /> \left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 3 & -1 & -2 & 1 \\ 0 & 8 & -8 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right]<br /> [/tex]

Which to me means that the loop is broken, and that [tex]x_{3}[/tex] is a free variable.

The book chooses [tex]x_{3}=7/8[/tex]. Is there a good reason for that value?
Maybe I am missing some important point here?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dafe said:

Homework Statement


With conductances [tex]c_{1}=1, c_{2}=c_{3}=2[/tex], multiply matrices to find
[tex]A^TCAx = f[/tex].
For [tex]f = (1,0,-1)[/tex] find a solution to [tex]A^TCAx = f[/tex].
Write the potentials [tex]x[/tex] and currents [tex]y = -CAx[/tex] on the triangle graph, when the current source [tex]f[/tex] goes into node 1 and out from node 3.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex] A^TCA = <br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 3 & -1 & -2 \\ -1 & 3 & -2 \\ -2 & -2 & 4 \\ \end{array} \right]<br /> [/tex]

After elimination I get:

[tex] A^TCA = <br /> \left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 3 & -1 & -2 & 1 \\ 0 & 8 & -8 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right]<br /> [/tex]

Which to me means that the loop is broken, and that [tex]x_{3}[/tex] is a free variable.

The book chooses [tex]x_{3}=7/8[/tex]. Is there a good reason for that value?
Maybe I am missing some important point here?

Thanks.

How does ATCA go from a 3x3 matrix to a 3x4 matrix?
 
Mark44, what Dafe wrote as his second matrix is NOT "ATCA". It is the row echelon form of the augmented matrix with [1 0 -1] as the fourth column.

Dafe, the only good reason I can see is that makes [itex]x_2= x_3+ 1/8= 1[/itex] but then [itex]x_1[/itex] is not an integer. Are you sure they "chose [itex]x_3= 7/8[/itex]". I would suspect that they solved for [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_3[/itex] in terms of [itex]x_2[/itex] and then chose [itex]x_2= 1[/itex].