[Linear Algebra] solution to A^TCAx=f

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving the equation A^TCAx = f with conductances c_{1}=1, c_{2}=c_{3}=2, where f = (1,0,-1). The matrix A^TCA is computed as a 3x3 matrix and then transformed into a 3x4 augmented matrix during the elimination process. The solution indicates that x_{3} is a free variable, and the book's choice of x_{3}=7/8 is questioned, suggesting it may be derived from setting x_{2}=1 to maintain integer values for other variables.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix operations, specifically matrix multiplication and row reduction.
  • Familiarity with linear algebra concepts such as augmented matrices and free variables.
  • Knowledge of conductance in electrical networks and its representation in matrix form.
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate linear equations in multiple variables.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of converting a matrix to its row echelon form.
  • Learn about the implications of free variables in linear systems.
  • Explore the relationship between conductance and potential in electrical networks.
  • Investigate methods for selecting specific variable values to simplify solutions in linear algebra.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, engineering, and physics who are working with linear algebra, particularly in applications involving electrical circuits and matrix equations.

Dafe
Messages
144
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


With conductances [tex]c_{1}=1, c_{2}=c_{3}=2[/tex], multiply matrices to find
[tex]A^TCAx = f[/tex].
For [tex]f = (1,0,-1)[/tex] find a solution to [tex]A^TCAx = f[/tex].
Write the potentials [tex]x[/tex] and currents [tex]y = -CAx[/tex] on the triangle graph, when the current source [tex]f[/tex] goes into node 1 and out from node 3.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex] A^TCA = <br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 3 & -1 & -2 \\ -1 & 3 & -2 \\ -2 & -2 & 4 \\ \end{array} \right]<br /> [/tex]

After elimination I get:

[tex] A^TCA = <br /> \left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 3 & -1 & -2 & 1 \\ 0 & 8 & -8 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right]<br /> [/tex]

Which to me means that the loop is broken, and that [tex]x_{3}[/tex] is a free variable.

The book chooses [tex]x_{3}=7/8[/tex]. Is there a good reason for that value?
Maybe I am missing some important point here?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dafe said:

Homework Statement


With conductances [tex]c_{1}=1, c_{2}=c_{3}=2[/tex], multiply matrices to find
[tex]A^TCAx = f[/tex].
For [tex]f = (1,0,-1)[/tex] find a solution to [tex]A^TCAx = f[/tex].
Write the potentials [tex]x[/tex] and currents [tex]y = -CAx[/tex] on the triangle graph, when the current source [tex]f[/tex] goes into node 1 and out from node 3.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



[tex] A^TCA = <br /> \left[ \begin{array}{ccc} 3 & -1 & -2 \\ -1 & 3 & -2 \\ -2 & -2 & 4 \\ \end{array} \right]<br /> [/tex]

After elimination I get:

[tex] A^TCA = <br /> \left[ \begin{array}{cccc} 3 & -1 & -2 & 1 \\ 0 & 8 & -8 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{array} \right]<br /> [/tex]

Which to me means that the loop is broken, and that [tex]x_{3}[/tex] is a free variable.

The book chooses [tex]x_{3}=7/8[/tex]. Is there a good reason for that value?
Maybe I am missing some important point here?

Thanks.

How does ATCA go from a 3x3 matrix to a 3x4 matrix?
 
Mark44, what Dafe wrote as his second matrix is NOT "ATCA". It is the row echelon form of the augmented matrix with [1 0 -1] as the fourth column.

Dafe, the only good reason I can see is that makes [itex]x_2= x_3+ 1/8= 1[/itex] but then [itex]x_1[/itex] is not an integer. Are you sure they "chose [itex]x_3= 7/8[/itex]". I would suspect that they solved for [itex]x_1[/itex] and [itex]x_3[/itex] in terms of [itex]x_2[/itex] and then chose [itex]x_2= 1[/itex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K