Linear algebra vector and lines in r3

alingy1
Messages
325
Reaction score
0
Let $$A(2,-1,1)$$, $$B$$ and $$C$$ be the vertices of a triangle where $$\overrightarrow{AB}$$ is parallel to $$\vec{v}=(2,0,-1), $$$$\overrightarrow{BC}$$ is parallel to $$\vec{w}=(1,-1,1)$$ and $$\angle(BAC)=90°$$. Find the equation of the line through $$\(A\)$$ and $$\(C\)$$ in vector and parametric forms.

Well, there is not much I can do here. I could find the equation of the plane:
$$-x-3y-2z=-1$$ by finding the normal of the two vectors given.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I only wish to have a hint.
 
alingy1 said:
Let $$A(2,-1,1)$$, $$B$$ and $$C$$ be the vertices of a triangle where $$\overrightarrow{AB}$$ is parallel to $$\vec{v}=(2,0,-1), $$$$\overrightarrow{BC}$$ is parallel to $$\vec{w}=(1,-1,1)$$ and $$\angle(BAC)=90°$$. Find the equation of the line through $$\(A\)$$ and $$\(C\)$$ in vector and parametric forms.

Well, there is not much I can do here. I could find the equation of the plane:
$$-x-3y-2z=-1$$ by finding the normal of the two vectors given.

First, I suggest you don't use the same notation for points as vectors. I would suggest angle brackets for vectors, i.e., ##\vec v = \langle 2,0,-1\rangle##. Second, are you sure you have stated the problem correctly? As it is, there is more than one solution. For example, you could just take side AB equal to your ##\vec v##, go the right distance along the ##\vec w## direction to make AC perpendicular to AB. Once you have one solution you could extend both legs of the right triangle proportionally to a larger similar triangle. Infinitely many answers.
 
  • Like
Likes alingy1
(On this board use "itex" and "/itex" for formulas you want to be "inline". That would not give that strange spacing!)

You are told that line \overline{AB} is parallel to vector <2, 0, -1>. That should tell you immediately that line \overline{AB} can be written in parametric form x= 2t+ x_0, y= y_0, z= -t+ z_0 where (x_0, y_0, z_0) can be any point on the line. Since the point A itself is given as (2, -1, 1), the line is x= 2t+ 2, y= -1, z= -t+ 1.

Similarly, we can write line \overline{BC} as x= t+ x_1, y= -t+ y_1, z= t+ z_1 but we are not given a point on
\overline{BC}.

We do know, however, that \overline{AC} is perpendicular to \overline{AB} so must be in the plane through A normal to \overline{AB}: 2(x- 2)- (z- 1)= 0 as well as lying in the same plane that \overline{BC} is in.
 
  • Like
Likes alingy1
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top