Linear attenuation coefficient

AI Thread Summary
To determine the thickness of a foil made from absorber II that provides the same absorption as a 1mm thick foil made from absorber I for X-rays with an energy of 5X10^6, the linear attenuation coefficients of the two absorbers are crucial. Absorber I has a coefficient of 0.4, while absorber II has a coefficient of 0.2. The relationship I/I0 = e^(-ax) indicates that if the attenuation coefficient is halved, the thickness must be doubled to maintain the same intensity. Therefore, the calculated thickness for absorber II is 2mm. This conclusion aligns with the principle that a lower attenuation coefficient requires a greater thickness to achieve equivalent absorption.
jagguy
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This i self study!
Hi, How thick should a foil made from absorber II be to give the same absoption as 1mm thick foil made from absorber I for xrays with energy 5X106


xray beam passing through an absorption material it is attenuated , this is given by

I/Io e-ax

io =initial intensity of the beam
i=intensity of beam from absorber taken as average amount of photons emerging from 1cm2
x=thickness of slab of absorbing material in cm-1
a=linear attenuation material
e=2.718

table photon energies 5X106
absorber 1 .4
absorber 2 .2

Homework Equations



linear attenuation coefficient=% reduced/thickness of absorber

The Attempt at a Solution



used logs to find x

tried to use linear attenuation coefficient
but really got stuck on what to do
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I/Io= e-ax
 
I/Io =e-ax
 
i go t an answer of 2mm because ax value where a is halved so x is doubled to keep same forumla
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top