Linear Momemtum Need dire assistance

Vivek
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ladies and Gentlemen

This is from my class work and i was not there when the teacher did this.I want to understand this.Please assist

A car with a linear momentum of 3.0 x 10 raised to 4 KG x M/S is brought to a stop in 5.0 sec.What is the manitude of the average braking force?

I really don't get this one.Any help is more than appreciated.:smile:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: Newton's Second Law can be thought of in this way:
\Sigma F = \frac{d}{dt} (mv)
 
FredGarvin said:
Hint: Newton's Second Law can be thought of in this way:
The second law is that the acceleration of an object is dependent on two factors - the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object...

But in relation to the question there are a few variables missing..:confused:
 
integral of force-time graph is change in momentum
 
Most simply, force equals mass times acceleration. Although you are given the initial momentum, rather than the initial speed, since momentum equal mass times speed, and mass stays contant in this problem, just divide the "change in momentum" (from 3.0 x 104 to 0) by the time required.
 
Vivek said:
The second law is that the acceleration of an object is dependent on two factors - the net force acting upon the object and the mass of the object...
But in relation to the question there are a few variables missing..:confused:
Look at it like this...Starting with

F = m a where a = \frac{d}{dt} v

F = m \frac{d}{dt} v since mass is constant, we can pull it inside the derivative

F = \frac{d}{dt} (mv) or F = \frac{d}{dt} P where P = mv is the linear momentum.

So if the force is equal to the time rate of change of the momentum, how does that fit into your problem?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
9K
Replies
14
Views
19K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Back
Top