Linear momentum as a vector - help

AI Thread Summary
Linear momentum is a vector quantity that can be added together even if the vectors are not aligned along the same line, as long as their components are considered. In the case of two objects moving parallel to the x-axis, their total momentum can still be calculated despite differing y-coordinates. The key point is that momentum is proportional to velocity, and the addition of momentum vectors involves their components rather than their positions. If the y-components of the velocities cancel each other out, the net momentum in that direction will be zero. Angular momentum, however, does depend on the position of the objects, distinguishing it from linear momentum.
allok
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
hi

I'm really stuck and I hope you can help me.


I know that linear momentum is a vector, but I'm still not sure how to add them together when :

p1, p2, p ... linear momentum

If two objects A1 ( p1 = 100) and A2 ( p2 = -100) represent an isolated system and are moving along ( parallel to ) x-axis ( A1 in positive and A2 in negative direction ), then total linear momentum p is zero. But what if A1 is still moving along the x axis, but this time function of object A1 is y(x) = 3, while before it was y(x) = 0. Then even though linear momentum vectors p1 and p2 are still parallel, they no longer lie on the same line. Can we still add vectors p1 and p2 as if they were lying on the same line? If yes, why? If not, why not?



thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, remember that vectors can be "moved" (the mathematician in me cringes at that) and the total momentum of the system can be calculated as the sum of the two objects even if they are not at the same point (strictly speaking two distinct objects can never be at the same spot!).
 
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, remember that vectors can be "moved"



I know vectors can be 'moved', but why is this allowed with momentum vectors? Clearly, a system containing two objects with their veclocity vectors lying on same line differs ( somehow ) from system with velocity vectors parallel, but not lying on the same line. Why would we choose to neglect the fact that vectors ain't lying on the same line?
 
Why would we choose to neglect the fact that vectors ain't lying on the same line?
We are not neglecting that fact.

Momentum is proportional to velocity, which is a vector.

Let \vec{v_1}\,=\,v_{1x}\hat{x}\,+\,\,v_{1y}\hat{y},

and \vec{v_2}\,=\,v_{2x}\hat{x}\,+\,\,v_{2y}\hat{y}

the

\vec{v_1}\,+\,\vec{v_2}\,=\,(v_{1x}\,+\,v_{2x})\hat{x}\,+\,(v_{1y}\,+\,v_{2y})\hat{y}.

If there is no velocity in the y direction, or if v1y = -v2y, then the sum is obviously zero, and there is not net momentum in that direction. Adding these vectors does not involve the positions of the objects with those velocities.

Now there is a property called angular momentum, which does involve the position or location of objects. Colinear particles with the same magnitude but opposite direction would have zero net linear momentum and zero net angular momentum, but non-colinear forces while having no net linear momentum would have a net angular momentum for the same velocity conditions.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top