Linear Momentum of Particle and Rod

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the angular momentum of a particle and a rod during an elastic collision. It clarifies that the angular momentum for the particle after the collision remains at (L/2)mv due to the reference frame being fixed at the center of the rod, despite the rod moving. The key point is that angular momentum is calculated using the position vector and linear momentum, which remains valid in this frame. The conversation emphasizes the importance of maintaining a consistent reference frame for accurate calculations. Overall, the problem illustrates the complexities of collision dynamics in a non-inertial frame.
KDawgAtsu
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I don't need a solution to this problem, I just need some help understanding a part of it.

Homework Statement


The figure below shows a small mass, m, moving at an initial speed, v0 , colliding with a stick with
length, L, and mass, M. Both the mass and the stick lie on top of a table. The collision happens at the
tip of the stick. After the collision the mass continues in the same direction, but now with the speed, v.
For a specific value of the ratio m/M, the stick will collide with the small mass a second time. What is
this value, and how far will the small mass have traveled between collisions? Assume that the
collision is elastic.

Homework Equations


Initial Angular Momentum: (L/2)mv0
Angular Momentum After Collision: (1/12)mL2ω + (L/2)mv

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that the rod and the particle must be moving at same linear velocities for the second collision to happen. What I don't 100% understand is why the angular momentum for the particle after the collision is still (L/2)mv. Initially, the origin is at the center of the rod, but after the collision both the particle and the rod move to the right. I don't understand why, for the particle, the distance for the angular momentum is just (L/2); doesn't this place the origin at the center of mass of the rod, which is now moving and thus a noninertial frame?

Thanks for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reference system has the origin at the centre of the rod in rest and stays the same after impact. With respect to that point, the angular momentum of the particle is mv0L/2 before the impact and mvL/2 after the impact (supposing that the velocity of the particle is perpendicular to the rod). Do not forget that the angular momentum is the vector product of the position vector with the linear momentum, so it is
mv*r*sin(angle between r and v)=mvL/2.

It is more convenient to use a frame of reference in rest then one connected to the centre of mass.

This is a very nice problem, really. It took me some time to imagine how the rod can hit the particle again. :smile:

ehild
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top