Linearizing a circuit with a nonlinear element

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on linearizing a circuit with a nonlinear element using the node method and KCL. The incremental circuit analysis leads to the determination of voltage values through the Newton-Raphson method, yielding results for different input voltages. The incremental resistance of the nonlinear element is calculated, and the relationship between changes in voltage and current is established. The final calculations confirm the consistency of results across different parts of the analysis, suggesting accuracy in the approach taken. The discussion emphasizes the importance of expressing numerical results clearly, particularly for resistance values.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Consider the circuit containing the nonlinear element ##N## as shown below in Figure 3.

The ##i-v## relation fro the element ##N## is

$$i_A=(10\mathrm{A}(1-e^{-v_A/5\mathrm{V}})$$

(a) Write an equation which relates voltage ##V_A## to input voltage ##v_I##.

(b) Solve for voltate ##v_A## when ##v_I=\mathrm{10V}##.

(c) Find the incremental change in ##v_A## for a ##2%## increase in ##v_I## and calculate the ratio ##\Delta v_A/\Delta v_I##.

(d) Find the value for the incremental resistance of the nonlinear element ##N## by linearizing the expression for ##i_A## about the operating point when ##v_I=\mathrm{10V}##.

(e) Draw the incremental circuit model for the circuit shown in Figure 3.

(f) Find the ratio ##\Delta v_A/\Delta v_I## from the incremental circuit model and compare it with your exact model from part (c).
Relevant Equations
##v=iR##
I think I managed to solve the entire problem, as I show below. My main doubt is about item (e), the incremental circuit.
1706922060141.png


Part (a)
1706922087591.png

Using the node method and KCL we reach

$$\frac{v_I-v_A}{2}=10(1-e^{-v_A/5})\tag{1}$$

Part (b)
We can simplify (1) to

$$v_A=5\ln{\left ( \frac{20}{v_A+20-v_I} \right )}\tag{2}$$

If we sub in ##v_I=\mathrm{10V}## and use Newton-Raphson we find that ##v_A=\mathrm{2.39V}##.

Part (c)
Now let ##v_I=\mathrm{10.20V}##. Again by Newton-Raphson we find that ##v_A=\mathrm{2.45V}##.

Thus, ##\frac{\Delta v_A}{\Delta v_I}=\frac{0.06}{0.2}=0.3##.

Part (d)
Given ##i_A=10(1-e^{v_A/5})##, linearization about ##v_A=2.39\mathrm{V}## gives us

$$\Delta i_A=2e^{-2.39/5}\Delta v_A\tag{3}$$

Note that this means that the incremental resistance of the nonlinear element is ##\frac{1}{2e^{-2.39/5}}##.

Part (e)
I think the circuit is

1706922400329.png


Part (f)
Using the node method and our linearized expression for ##\Delta i_A## we have

$$\frac{\Delta v_I-\Delta v_A}{2}=2e^{-2.39/5}\Delta v_A\tag{4}$$

For ##\Delta v_I=0.2## and solving for ##\Delta v_A## we get ##\Delta v_A=0.0574##.

Thus, ##\frac{\Delta v_A}{\Delta v_I}=\frac{0.0574}{0.2}\approx 0.287##.

We compare this with the value we found in (c) which was 0.3.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your work is correct.

For part (d) you might evaluate ##2e^{-2.39/5}## as a single number for the linear relation ##\Delta i_A=2e^{-2.39/5}\Delta v_A##. Likewise, express the answer for the incremental resistance ##\frac{1}{2e^{-2.39/5}}## as a single numer with units.

In the diagram for part (e), you could indicate the resistance ##\large \frac 1 {i'(v_A)}## as a number with units.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top