Liquid-Vapour Interface: Adiabatic Expansion

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



2hgxzl4.png


Part(a): Show dL/dT can be expressed as:
Part(b): Show L = L0 + ΔCT for an indeal gas
Part(c): Show the following condition holds for an adiabatic expansion, when some liquid condenses out.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Finished parts (a) and (b).

Part (c)

Starting:
\frac{d}{dT} = \left(\frac{\partial}{\partial T}\right)_P + \left(\frac{dp}{dT}\right)\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial p}\right)_T

= \frac{d}{dT}(\frac{L}{T}) = (\frac{\partial \Delta S}{\partial T})_P + (\frac{dP}{dT})(\frac{\partial \Delta S}{\partial P})_T

Where ##\Delta_S = S_v - S_l## and using maxwell relation from ##dG = -sdT + VdP##:

= \frac{\Delta C_p}{T} - (\frac{dp}{dT})\left(\frac{\partial}{\partial T}(V_v - V_l)\right)_P

Using ideal gas equation ##PV = RT## and Clausius-Clapeyron: ##\frac{dP}{dT} = \frac{L}{TV_v} = \frac{LP}{RT^2}##:

= \frac{\Delta C_p}{T} - (\frac{R}{P})(\frac{LP}{RT^2})

= \frac{\Delta C_P}{T} - \frac{L}{T^2}

Therefore:

C_{P,liq} + T\frac{d}{dT}(\frac{L}{T}) = C_{P,vap} - \frac{L}{T_{vap}}

Condition for condensation: ##(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T})_S < 0 ## (Gradient must be less than zero for cooling effect).

Now what remains is to show that ##(\frac{\partial P}{\partial T})_S = C_{P,vap} - \frac{L}{T_{vap}}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bumpp
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top