Local Formulation of Continuity

  • Thread starter Thread starter Bashyboy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity Local
Bashyboy
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Let ##X## and ##Y## be topological spaces, and let ##\{U_i\}## be a collection of open sets in ##X##. If ##X = \bigcup U_i## and ##f|_{U_i}## is continuous, then ##f : X \to Y## continuous.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Let ##x \in X##, and let ##V \subseteq Y## be some open nbhd of ##f(x)##. Then there exists an ##i## such that ##x \in U_i##. Since ##f_{U_i}## is continuous, there exists a set ##\mathcal{O}## that is open in ##U_i## and contains ##x## such that ##f|_{U_i}(\mathcal{O}) \subseteq V##. But as ##U_i## is open in ##X##, so must ##\mathcal{O}##; moreover, ##f(\mathcal{O}) = f_{U_i}(\mathcal{O})## holds since ##\mathcal{O}## is completely contained in ##U_i##. Therefore, ##f## must be continuous.

How does that sound?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There seem to be some steps missing. What is needed is to show that ##f^{-1}(V)## is open. There are some deductions in the above proof that may relate to that, but nothing that explicitly reaches that conclusion - ie 'closes the deal'.
 
Well, I am working with a different formulation of continuity:

For each ##x \in X## and each neighborhood ##V \subseteq Y## of ##f(x)##, there is a neighborhood ##U## of ##x## such that ##f(U) \subseteq V##.

Perhaps that makes a difference.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top