Location of maximum desctructive intereference

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gravitino22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Maximum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the maximum value of y for fully destructive interference from two in-phase radio sources located at (0,0) and (3λ,0). The key equation for maximum destructive interference is dsinθ = (m + 1/2)λ, derived from Young's double-slit experiment. A user attempts to solve the problem by constructing a right triangle but struggles with the correct representation of the hypotenuse and the angle involved. Clarifications suggest focusing on the path length difference, ∆L, which must equal (m + 1/2)λ, rather than the angle. The final result indicates that the maximum y value for destructive interference is y = 35λ/4.
Gravitino22
Messages
29
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two radio sources in the xy plane are in phase and emitting the same wavelength, λ. Their locations are at coordinates (0,0) and (3λ,0). Show that the largest value of y at which fully destructive intereference may occur at coordinates (0, y) is given by
y=35λ/4



Homework Equations



Maximum destructive interference : dsinθ=(m+1/2)λ it’s derived from youngs two slit experiment
and ∆L = dsinθ <<< was used to derive the above, d is the source separation.


The Attempt at a Solution



My train of thought was that since we want the maximum difference in length the angle must be maximum but if the angle was 90 the waves wouldn’t even meet. So I constructed a right triangle from the problem and deduced that the difference in length would be
∆L =y-sqrt(y^2-9λ^2)=3λsinθ
And this is where i got stuck because I am confused on which angle we are looking at.


Any help is greatly appreciated ! thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
one bump because I still haven't solved this and my test is this week =/. Thanks for the help
 
Gravitino22 said:

The Attempt at a Solution



My train of thought was that since we want the maximum difference in length the angle must be maximum but if the angle was 90 the waves wouldn’t even meet. So I constructed a right triangle from the problem and deduced that the difference in length would be
∆L =y-sqrt(y^2-9λ^2)=3λsinθ
That's a reasonable start, but I see a couple of problems...

1. If the right triangle vertices are at (0,0), (3λ,0), and (0,y), then the legs of the right Δ are y and 3λ, and your sqrt expression should represent the hypotenuse (distance from (0,y) to (3λ,0). As you have written it, it does not represent the hypotenuse ... but a simple correction will fix that.

And this is where i got stuck because I am confused on which angle we are looking at.

2. I wouldn't worry about the angle. As you probably know, ∆L must be (m+1/2)λ here, where m is 0, ±1, ±2, etc. You can use this fact with the expression you wrote for ∆L.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top