Location of zero net electric force

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the ratio of distances d_1 and d_2 at which particle 0 experiences zero net electric force due to repulsion from particle 1 and attraction toward particle 2. The relevant equation for electric force is provided, emphasizing the relationship between the forces and distances. The solution process reveals that the correct ratio is expressed as d_1/d_2 = sqrt(q_1/q_2), with clarification that the negative sign should be disregarded since it pertains to direction rather than distance. Participants confirm that the derived ratio is accurate, reinforcing the solution's validity. The final consensus is that the ratio d_1/d_2 = sqrt(q_1/q_2) is indeed correct.
gnarkil
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Particle 0 experiences a repulsion from particle 1 and an attraction toward particle 2. For certain values of d_1 and d_2, the repulsion and attraction should balance each other, resulting in no net force. For what ratio d_1/d_2 is there no net force on particle 0?
Express your answer in terms of any or all of the following variables: k, q_0, q_1, q_2.

Homework Equations



electric force F = kq_1q_2/r^2 where k = 9*10^9, q_1 and q_2 represent charges in coulombs and r is distance in meters between point charges

Fnet = sqrt(F1^2 + F2^2) where F1 is repulsive force and F2 is attractive force

The Attempt at a Solution



Fnet = sqrt(F1^2 + F2^2)
0^2 = F1^2 + F2^2
-F2^2 = F1^2
-[(k*q_2*q_0)/(d_2)^2] = [(k*q_1*q_0)/(d_1)^2]
-(d_1)^2/(d_2)^2 = (k*q_1*q_0)/(k*q_2*2_0)
-d_1/d_2 = sqrt(q_1/q_2)
d1_1/d_2 = -sqrt(q_1/q_2)

correct ratio?
 

Attachments

  • d1d2.JPG
    d1d2.JPG
    9.7 KB · Views: 516
Physics news on Phys.org
There shouldn't be a negative sign when you're considering distance instead of displacement.
 
so aside from the negative sign, the ratio of d1_1/d_2 = sqrt(q_1/q_2) is correct?
 
gnarkil said:
so aside from the negative sign, the ratio of d1_1/d_2 = sqrt(q_1/q_2) is correct?

Yes.
 
okay thanks for the help
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top