Solving Logarithmic Equations: Log(3-x) + Log(3+x) = Log5

  • Thread starter Thread starter ms. confused
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logarithms
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on solving the logarithmic equation log(3-x) + log(3+x) = log5. Participants clarify that the equation can be simplified using the property of logarithms, leading to log(9 - x^2) = log5. This results in the equation 9 - x^2 = 5, which simplifies to x^2 = 4, yielding the solutions x = ±2. Missteps in manipulating the logarithmic terms are highlighted, particularly the incorrect transformation of (3-x) and (3+x). The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying logarithmic properties to solve such equations.
ms. confused
Messages
90
Reaction score
0
OK I am completely lost :eek: on this log equation:

log(3-x) + log(3+x) = log5

Does anyone get an answer of ±2? If so HOW did you do it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keep in mind that log(a) + log(b) = log(ab).

--J
 
Exactly, so this is what I did:

log(x^2 - 9) = log5

(x^2 -14) = 0

not even close to what I'm supposed to get, no idea how to factor what I just got!
 
How'd you get from

log(x^2 - 9) = log5

to

(x^2 -14) = 0

Are you sure you can do that?

--J
 
ms. confused said:
Exactly, so this is what I did:

log(x^2 - 9) = log5

(x^2 -14) = 0

First of all, I think you expanded that wrong.
Secondly, that's not how you "undo" a log.

log(3-x) + log(3+x) = log5
log[(3-x)(3+x)] = log5
log(9 - x^2) = log5
9 - x^2 = 5
4 = x^2
x = +- 2
 
So, basically I shouldn't have changed (3-x) to (x-3) or (3+x) to (x+3)?
 
there is another way to solve this problem, using the following formulas.
log(\alpha)+log(\beta)=log(\alpha\cdot\beta)
log(\alpha)-log(\beta)=log(\frac{\alpha}{\beta})

about your second question :
(x+3)=(3+x)
(x-3)\not=(3-x)
 
ShawnD said:
Secondly, that's not how you "undo" a log.

My high school math teacher used to call it "dropping logs". I always found that funny.

:-p
 
Back
Top