Looking for confirmation on probability homework question?

Topgun_68
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Looking for confirmation on probability!

Sorry, posted in wrong forum. It was a probability question which is why I posted it here. Can someone move it to homework section if need be. Thanks!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Can someone let me know if I am doing this correctly, because the answer I am getting seems to small. I thought the probability would be much higher since the woman out number the men by over 50% and we are just looking for 1.

Question: Suppose that a programming team has 17 women and 15 men. Three people must be chosen to work on a special project. What is the probability that the group selected has at least 1 women in it?

My work:

(17C1) -> To choose 1 women
(15C2) -> To choose 2 men
(32C3) -> Total groups of 3 among all people

(17C1)(15C2)
--------------
32C3 17 * 105
--------
4960

1785
----- = .360
4950 I've seem some examples where they subtract this answer from 1 which not looks more reasonable, but is it correct and can someone explain why?

ex.. 1 - .360 = .640

Thanks for any input!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Read the statement carefully: at least one woman.
 
Ahh, so would I use:

(17C1 + 17C2 + 17C3) / 32C3 to account for having 1,2 or 3 women chosen? Or would I have to account for the 8 possibilities of women/men?

Thanks for feedback. I hope this doesn't get deleted for my lack of reading. I was just getting ready to erase it and repost..

DrClaude said:
Read the statement carefully: at least one woman.
 
Topgun_68 said:
(17C1 + 17C2 + 17C3) / 32C3 to account for having 1,2 or 3 women chosen?
Not quite. If you have for instance exactly 2 women, is the number of possiblities 17C2? Aren't you forgetting something?

And this might be a good time to use the other method you mention: 1 - something.
 
I'm forgetting the men.. So would it be..

(17C1)(15C2) + (17C2)(15C1) + 17C3
-------------------------------------
32C3

I was thinking of subtracting the result from 1. Do I have to account for no women..



DrClaude said:
Not quite. If you have for instance exactly 2 women, is the number of possiblities 17C2? Aren't you forgetting something?

And this might be a good time to use the other method you mention: 1 - something.
 
Topgun_68 said:
I'm forgetting the men.. So would it be..

(17C1)(15C2) + (17C2)(15C1) + 17C3
-------------------------------------
32C3
Right.

Topgun_68 said:
I was thinking of subtracting the result from 1.
Why would you do that? Calculate the value numerically and see what makes sense. There is a way to calculate the initial problem as 1-something. Can you figure that one out?

Topgun_68 said:
Do I have to account for no women..
Account in what way?
 
Hmm, I think I got it now.

1 - ((15C3) / (32C3)) = .908

So calculate the probability of no women from the total, than subtract it from 1.

I calculated it my long way above and I get the same answer. Can you confirm this is correct :<)

Thanks for your help on this.
DrClaude said:
Right.

DrClaude said:
Right.Why would you do that? Calculate the value numerically and see what makes sense. There is a way to calculate the initial problem as 1-something. Can you figure that one out?Account in what way?
 
Topgun_68 said:
Hmm, I think I got it now.

1 - ((15C3) / (32C3)) = .908

So calculate the probability of no women from the total, than subtract it from 1.

I calculated it my long way above and I get the same answer. Can you confirm this is correct :<)
That is indeed correct.

Topgun_68 said:
Thanks for your help on this.
You're welcome!
 
Back
Top