Lorentz Force Law, am i messing up vector algebra?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving the Lorentz Force Law, where an electron's motion is influenced by electric and magnetic fields. The user is struggling with calculations related to the electric field given the electron's initial velocity and acceleration. Feedback suggests that rounding errors may be affecting the results, and it's emphasized that using the full calculator values is crucial for accuracy. Additionally, there's a reminder about the negative charge of the electron, which should be considered in the calculations. The user is encouraged to re-evaluate their approach to ensure correct application of vector algebra.
mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Okay here is my work:
http://show.imagehosting.us/show/891312/0/nouser_891/T0_-1_891312.jpg
and here is my calculations part:
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/5539/lastscan7qc.jpg
Problem says:
14. [HRW7 28.P.008.] An electron has an initial velocity of (14.0 j + 21.0 k) km/s and a constant acceleration of (3.50 10^12 m/s2) i in a region in which uniform electric and magnetic fields are present. If B = (400 µT) i, find the electric field E.
V/m i + V/m j + V/m k

I know I'm getting the wrong answer because i tried to submit the i component and it was wrong i got:
19.88i

any ideas where i screwed up?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't really done the question here, but from the looks of it you have rounded your values incorrectly. Are you using the full calculator value in your calculation though? If so then it doesn't matter, but if you're using rounded values then your answer might just be out by a little. You're using SI units throughout so you definitely have V/m as your final unit.
 
last time I checked, electrons had charge negative (-) e !
 
so u don't use the magntiude of the charge in that equation?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top