Lorentz Force Law derivation using the Lagrangian

Elvex
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
* implies time derivative, _i and _j are indices.


Homework Statement


Consider a Particle of mass m and charge q acted on by electric and magnetic fields E(x,t) and B(x,t). these fields can be described in therms of the scalar and vector potentials PHI(x,t) and A(x,t) for which E= - gradPHI and B = CurlA.
Show that the Lagrangian equations of motion for this Lagrangian give back the Lorentz Force Law.


Homework Equations


L= (1/2)mx*^2 - qPHI + qx*.A

Lorentz Force Law: mx**= qE + qx* x B

Lagrange Equation of Motion: (d/dt)(dL/dx*)= dL/dx


The Attempt at a Solution



It was easy for me to derive the qE part of the force law, but I'm having problems with qx* x B.
First, I used einstein summation notation to express x* X Curl(A), a double cross product and I got two terms,

x*_i (dA_i / dx_j) e_j - x*_j (dA_i / dx_j) e_i

There's a chance this is wrong, I haven't used summation notation in a while.

Now when I take dL/dx for the term with A in the lagrangian. I only get that first term from the double cross product.

I'm not really sure what to do in taking the derivative of x* . A

would that be... x*. gradA ?

Basically, I don't know how to get the qx* x B term out of taking derivatives of the Lagrangian.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem's not too simple. You need to use the identity

\nabla (\overrightarrow{a}\cdot \overrightarrow{b})=(\overrightarrow{a}\cdot<br /> \nabla )\overrightarrow{b}+(\overrightarrow{b}\cdot \nabla )\overrightarrow{a}+\overrightarrow{a}\times (\nabla \times \overrightarrow{b})+<br /> \overrightarrow{b}\times (\nabla \times \overrightarrow{a})
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top