Lorentz Transformation - Clock

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the relationship between the time period of a moving clock and that of a stationary clock using Lorentz Transformation equations. The key equation used is t' = γ(t - vx/c²), where γ is the Lorentz factor. Participants clarify the process of substituting x with vt and factoring out t to simplify the expression. The final form of the equation is t' = t/γ, indicating time dilation. The conversation emphasizes understanding the mathematical steps and correcting errors in notation.
CGM
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use the Lorentz Transformation equations to derive the formula relating the time period of a moving clock to that of a stationary clock

Homework Equations


X'=y(X-vt)
Y'=Y
Z'=Z
t'=y(t-vx/c^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


t'=1/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2) . (t-vx/c^2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CGM said:

Homework Statement


Use the Lorentz Transformation equations to derive the formula relating the time period of a moving clock to that of a stationary clock

Homework Equations


X'=y(X-vt)
Y'=Y
Z'=Z
t'=y(t-vx/c^2)

The Attempt at a Solution


t'=1/sqrt(1-(v/c)^2) . (t-vx/c^2)

You're almost there. If the clock is at rest in the primed coordinate system, that means that its location as a function of time can be chosen to be X' = 0. So using the first equation from your "Relevant equations", you can solve for x in terms of t. Plug that into your equation.
 
stevendaryl said:
You're almost there. If the clock is at rest in the primed coordinate system, that means that its location as a function of time can be chosen to be X' = 0. So using the first equation from your "Relevant equations", you can solve for x in terms of t. Plug that into your equation.
So, t'=yt?
 
CGM said:
So, t'=yt?

How did you get that? Take your equation, t' = \gamma (t - \frac{vx}{c^2}) and replace x by v t.
 
stevendaryl said:
How did you get that? Take your equation, t' = \gamma (t - \frac{vx}{c^2}) and replace x by v t.
Never mind I did something silly.
So 0=y(x-vt) => x=vt

t'=y(t-(v/t)^2 . t)
 
CGM said:
Never mind I did something silly.
So 0=y(x-vt) => x=vt

t'=y(t-(v/t)^2 . t)

I'm afraid you did something silly again. If you start with t' = \gamma (t - \frac{vx}{c^2}) and substitute x=vt, you get: t' = \gamma (t - \frac{v^2 t}{c^2}). Now factor out a factor of t from the right-hand side, and remember what \gamma is.
 
stevendaryl said:
I'm afraid you did something silly again. If you start with t' = \gamma (t - \frac{vx}{c^2}) and substitute x=vt, you get: t' = \gamma (t - \frac{v^2 t}{c^2}). Now factor out a factor of t from the right-hand side, and remember what \gamma is.
Yes that's what I said, maybe my notation is confusing.

t'=yt-((v/c)^2)t
t'=t(y-(v/c)^2)

Is this the answer or is there more simplification to be done?
 
CGM said:
Yes that's what I said, maybe my notation is confusing.

t'=yt-((v/c)^2)t
t'=t(y-(v/c)^2)

Is this the answer or is there more simplification to be done?

No, you have the expression

t' = \gamma (t - (v/c)^2 t)

Factor out t to get:

t' = \gamma t (1 - (v/c)^2)

Now, if you remember what the definition of \gamma is, you can write 1-(v/c)^2 = 1/\gamma^2
 
stevendaryl said:
No, you have the expression

t' = \gamma (t - (v/c)^2 t)

Factor out t to get:

t' = \gamma t (1 - (v/c)^2)

Now, if you remember what the definition of \gamma is, you can write 1-(v/c)^2 = 1/\gamma^2
Ah yes, I see my mistake. Thank you.

t'=t/y
 
Back
Top