Lorentz Transformation Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a second particle in a laboratory frame using the Lorentz Velocity Transformation Equation. One particle moves at 0.650c, while the relative speed between the two particles is 0.950c. The initial calculation yields a speed of 0.784c, but confusion arises over the sign conventions used in the formula. Participants suggest that the discrepancy may stem from different conventions or a potential typo in the provided solution. Ultimately, the focus remains on the correct application of the transformation equation to determine the speed accurately.
phisci
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


2 particles are created in a high-energy accelerator and move off in opposite directions. The speed of one particle, as measured in the laboratory is 0.650c, and the speed of each particle relative to the other is 0.950c. What is the speed of the second particle, as measured in the laboratory.


Homework Equations


Lorentz Velocity Transformation Equation.

Vx= Vx'+u/(1+(uVx'/C2))


The Attempt at a Solution


I let S be the frame of reference of the laboratory and S, be the frame of reference of the first particle.

From the question, u=+0.650c and the velocity of the 2nd particle in the S' frame is
Vx'= -0.950c since it is approaching the first particle.

Hence when i plug in the values into the formula, I should get

Vx=[(-0.950+0.650)]c/(1+(-0.950x0.650)) = -0.784c

the speed is hence 0.784c.

However the solution given puts a negative sign to the 0.650 in the denominator. i.e.
Vx=[(-0.950+0.650)]c/(1+(0.950x-0.650))

Why did they negate the 0.650 and not the 0.950? Where have i gone wrong in my reasoning? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably just a typo. Your solution is fine.
 
You can also use (0.950-0.650)c/1-0.650*0.950) = 0.784c. Since the question doesn't label one direction as positive, and only asks for speed (the magnitude of velocity), it doesn't really matter. I don't know why they chose to deploy the minus signs as they did; maybe it's a trivial difference in convention: which formula they started off with, and how they assigned the variables in this particular problem to those of the general formula etc., or maybe just a typo as vela suggests. I wouldn't lose too much sleep over it ;-)
 
Last edited:
okay noted. thanks alot! :)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top