Lorentz Transformation via Rotation

  • Thread starter Thread starter snoopies622
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lorentz Rotation
snoopies622
Messages
852
Reaction score
29
To me the easiest way to arrive at the Lorentz transformation is by rotation, using one dimension for space and the other for the product of time, the speed of light and the square root of minus one. This seems justifiable to me if one starts with the premise that ds^2 =ds'^2. I can see how if one assumes that the speed of light is the same in both frames of reference then ds^2=0 implies ds'^2=0 (and vice versa). But I don't know why ds^2=ds'^2 in general. Must one find the Lorentz transformation in some other way in order to arrive at this equality?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
snoopies622 said:
To me the easiest way to arrive at the Lorentz transformation is by rotation, using one dimension for space and the other for the product of time, the speed of light and the square root of minus one. This seems justifiable to me if one starts with the premise that ds^2 =ds'^2. I can see how if one assumes that the speed of light is the same in both frames of reference then ds^2=0 implies ds'^2=0 (and vice versa). But I don't know why ds^2=ds'^2 in general. Must one find the Lorentz transformation in some other way in order to arrive at this equality?
Whatever works easiest for you!
But notice that this only works for flat spacetimes.
 
ict was popular 100 years ago. It has lost fashion, because it can't be extended to GR, and it complicates relativistic QM, with two different i's.
 
Thanks to you both. I didn't realize that ict wouldn't work for non-flat spacetimes, but I guess it would yield a complex ds^2 (and who wants that?).
 

Thread 'Describing the Big Bang'

I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
View full post »
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'

See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
View full post »

Thread 'A sufficient condition for integrability of equation ##\nabla g=0##'

In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
View full post »

Similar threads

A Show Lagrangian is invariant under a Lorentz transformation without using generators
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Alternative Ways to Realize Invariance: Lorentz Transformation
Replies
20
Views
2K
A Characterizing GR Traj in Minkowski Space
Replies
17
Views
2K
I Question about full Lorentz transformation
3
Replies
101
Views
6K
I Does Lorentz invariance imply Einstein's synchronization convention?
Replies
32
Views
3K
I Lorentz Transformation in One-Dimensional Space
Replies
4
Views
2K
I Spacetime interval and basic properties of light
3
Replies
141
Views
9K
A Continuation of Coordinates Across Black Hole Horizons
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Finite Lorentz Transformation via Poisson Bracket
Replies
3
Views
2K
I Can we choose different functional forms for Lorentz transformation?
Replies
10
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top