Lorentz Transforms + Relativity of Simultaneity

Dakar
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm studying special relativity this semester and stumbled onto a couple of problems. These have nothing to do with my homework or anything, they're just a couple of things I thought up. Since I have little contact with my teacher (it's an online course), it'd probably be a good idea to put them here. I'm sorry if this is the wrong forum, but again this isn't homework but questions on the topic.

---

Person A sets up, in the lab frame, a string of collinear firecrackers evenly spaced one meter apart. Person B is in the rocket frame, traveling parallel to the firecrackers at speed .5*c. A sets off the firecrackers so they all go off the same time, her frame. To B, the distances every two consecutive firecrackers are lorentz contracted to 1*sqrt(1 - .5^2) .866 meters. So after the first flash of light reaches him, the next one should arrive after 1/(1 - .5) 1.73 seconds. Is this correct? If not, what did I accidentally add or leave out? Does this demonstrate the relativity of simultaneity?

---

We'll define A to be gamma. We have a lab frame (with coordinates x
and t), and a rocket frame (with x' and t'). In the lab frame, there
are two points, x1 and x2. The distance between them is dx. In the
rocket frame, the two points are at locations A(x1 - vt) and A(x2 -
vt). Therefore, in the rocket frame dx' is A*dx.

Now, we place a bar between those two points of length dx. It Lorentz
contracts to length dx/A as observed in rocket frame. So the space
increased to A*dx and length of the bar in that space decreased to
1/A * dx. Is this all correct, or am I missing something here?

---

Thanks!

Dakar
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dakar said:
Person A sets up, in the lab frame, a string of collinear firecrackers evenly spaced one meter apart. Person B is in the rocket frame, traveling parallel to the firecrackers at speed .5*c. A sets off the firecrackers so they all go off the same time, her frame. To B, the distances every two consecutive firecrackers are lorentz contracted to 1*sqrt(1 - .5^2) .866 meters. So after the first flash of light reaches him, the next one should arrive after 1/(1 - .5) 1.73 seconds. Is this correct? If not, what did I accidentally add or leave out? Does this demonstrate the relativity of simultaneity?

---

Well, you have to add the relativity of simultaneity, i.e. the time transformation \gamma(t-vx/c^2).

For example, we have 2 firecrackers starting simultaneously at the coordinates x1=0, t1=0 and x2=1m, t2=0.

What are the coordinates (both space and time) of those two events in the rocketframe?

Regards,
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top