Lowering of Vapour Pressure - a C.P ?

AI Thread Summary
Lowering of vapor pressure is confirmed as a colligative property, as demonstrated through the equation Pa = Poaχa, where Pa represents the vapor pressure of the solution, Poa is the vapor pressure of the pure solvent, and χa is the mole fraction of the solvent. By substituting χa with (1-χb), it is shown that the lowering of vapor pressure is directly proportional to the number of moles of solute in dilute solutions. However, there is a distinction made in some literature, stating that while relative lowering of vapor pressure is a colligative property, the absolute lowering of vapor pressure may not be classified as such. Additionally, a request for free reaction simulation software, similar to Aspen Plus, was made in the discussion.
zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0
Is lowering of vapour pressure a colligative property?

I tried proving this and found it to be true.

Pa = Poaχa, where a=solvent and b=solute

Substituting χa=1-χb and some rearranging, we get

Poa-Pa=Poaχb

As Poa is constant for a given liquid at a given temperature, lowering of vapour pressure (LHS) is directly proportional to the no. of moles of solute provided the solution is very dilute.

Is my proof correct?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Hi
your proof is correct
right lowering of vapour pressure really is a colligative property
 
But my book says that Relative lowering of vapour pressure is a colligative property but lowering of vapour pressure is not a colligative property.
 
hi,

can anyone tell me where i can get a free reaction simulation software, like aspen plus.

thanks.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top