Magnetic field created by a solenoid

Pepealej
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

Inside a very long, straight and hollow plastic tube (R << L) we have ionized liquid moving at a velocity v = 100 m/s. The net charge per unit volume is n = 106 electrons/m3. The radius of the tube is R = 10cm. Around the tube we have a solenoid, with n = 100 loops/m, through which circulates a current I = 2 A.

Estimate the magnetic field on the axis of the tube at a distance d >> L.

Book's answer

0 T or, considering the system as a dipole, B=\dfrac{\mu_0}{2\pi d^3}N\pi r^2

My question

I understand how the magnetic field is 0 T but, how can I consider the system as a dipole to obtain the other answer?

Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Pepealej said:
Book's answer

0 T or, considering the system as a dipole, B=\dfrac{\mu_0}{2\pi d^3}N\pi r^2

My question

I understand how the magnetic field is 0 T but, how can I consider the system as a dipole to obtain the other answer?

Thanks in advance!


Well, we can all see B = 0. But their other answer (dipole) makes no sense since neither the ion nor the wire current I is included in their formula. Probably a typo, but ...

I would say:
Consider all the turns of the coil bunched together to form a single-turn loop with current = nLI. That makes using Biot-Savart easy along the axis & is justifiable by d >> L.

As for the ionic current, about all I could see is trying to compute the magnetic vector potential integral A, then B = del x A.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top