Why Does a Magnetic Field Do Zero Work?

AI Thread Summary
A discussion revolves around understanding why magnetic fields do zero work, particularly focusing on a proof presented by a lecturer. The proof involves the equation \vec{B}\cdot\textit{d}\vec{l}=0, which indicates that magnetic forces do not change the kinetic energy of a charged particle. A participant expresses confusion regarding the introduction of a factor of one-half in the proof, questioning its origin. The conversation also touches on the product rule in calculus, which relates to the derivation of kinetic energy changes. Ultimately, the discussion seeks clarity on the mathematical reasoning behind these concepts.
conorordan
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This isn't strictly homework, I'm going over my lecturer's notes before the exam and I don't understand a part of this proof for magnetic fields doing no work.

This is the second proof he gave, the first being the more standard \vec{B}\cdot\textit{d}\vec{l}=0

Homework Equations



So in the second proof he does it like this;

I0bwTNq.png

I cannot figure out where he gets the factor of a half in the third line, to make the equation come out as change in kinetic energy = 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi conorordan! :smile:
conorordan said:
I cannot figure out where he gets the factor of a half in the third line

product rule

d(v·v)/dt = v·dv/dt + dv/dt·v = 2 v·dv/dt :wink:
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top