Magnetic field electron question

lemaire
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




In 2.2 µs, an electron moves 11 cm in the direction of a 0.07 T magnetic field. The electron's velocity components perpendicular and parallel to the field are equal.
What is the length of its actual spiral trajectory and How many orbits about the field direction does it complete?

Homework Equations



T = 2pir/v = 2pim/qB

The Attempt at a Solution


I was thinking of using the period, but the velocity is unknown.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You know the speed because it tells you that it moves 11 cm in 2.2us along the field direction, and it also tells you the split of velocity along and normal to the field.
 
so which formula should i use in order to solve the problem.
 
Assume that B is along z. The electron speed is 11 cm/2.2 us = 5e6 cm/s, and the transverse component of velocity v_t is \sqrt{2} times smaller. v_z is the same.

The Lorentz force is

\vec{F}=q\vec{v}\times\vec{B}.

Only the transverse velocity components contribute to the force. Divide v_t into x and y components and solve the equation for each one. You'll see that, in the transverse plane, the particle executes a circular motion at the cyclotron frequency

\omega=\frac{qB}{m}.

Adding the z velocity gives a spiral. That gives you enough information to answer the questions.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top