Magnetic Field in a Cylindrical Conductor

Click For Summary
A cylindrical conductor with a radius of 2.49 cm carries a current of 2.17 A uniformly distributed across its cross-section. The initial attempt to calculate the magnetic field using the equation B = µI / 2πr was incorrect. The correct formula for the magnetic field inside the conductor is B = µIr / 2πa^2. Using this formula, the magnetic field at r = R/2 was calculated to be 8.71e-6 T. This clarification is useful for anyone facing similar issues in magnetic field calculations within conductors.
Hypnos_16
Messages
148
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A cylindrical conductor of radius R = 2.49 cm carries a current of I = 2.17 A along its length; this current is uniformly distributed throughout the cross-section of the conductor. Calculate the magnetic field midway along the radius of the wire (that is, at r = R/2).

Radius (m) = 2.49 cm = 0.0249 m = 0.01245 m (as asked)
Current (I) = 2.17 A


Homework Equations



I thought it was B = µI / 2πr because i was given a sheet of equations and this was the only one that seemed to fit it.


The Attempt at a Solution



B = µI / 2πr
B = (4π x 10^-7)(2.17) / 2π(0.01245)
B = 3.49e-5 T

Though this isn't the right answer. Not sure what's gone wrong here.
I also thought it was zero since it's a "conductor" also not right...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not to worry, i got the answer. I was using the wrong equation.
For values of Magnetic Field inside the given radius the equation is

B = µIr / 2πa^2
B = (4π x 10^-7)(2.17)(0.01245) / 2π(0.0249^2)
B = 8.71e-6 T

In case anyone else had the same or similar problems.
 
  • Like
Likes J6204
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
559
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
478
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K