Magnetism lab involving a nail and an Allen wrench

Click For Summary
The experiment demonstrated that an Allen wrench can become magnetized by contact with a magnet, allowing it to attract an iron nail. While this method is functional and easy to perform, it only creates a temporary magnet, which is a limitation. Alternative methods, such as striking the nail with a hammer, may also induce magnetism, though the effectiveness is uncertain. Discussions suggest that rubbing a magnet along an object may yield better magnetization than a single touch. Caution is advised when magnetizing tools, as some may function poorly when magnetized, highlighting the need for further research on magnetization techniques and their effects.
VitaminK
Messages
46
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
I performed this lab where I had to investigate the effect of an external magnetic field on an iron nail.
Relevant Equations
no equations for this
So basically what I had to do was:
1. take a Allen wrench and let it come in contact with an iron nail. Nothing happened here. None of the objects are magnetic.
2. take the Allen wrench and let it touch the North end of a magnet. Then let the wrench come in Contact with the iron nail. Here the wrench becomes magnetic and attracts the nail.
3. take the wrench and let it touch the South end of the magnet. Then let the wrench come in Contact with the iron nail. Same as in 2). The wrench becomes magnetic and attracts the nail.

My question is if this method is functional and what are the pros and cons? Are there alternative ways to do this that would work even better?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
VitaminK said:
My question is if this method is functional and what are the pros and cons? Are there alternative ways to do this that would work even better?
What are your thoughts so far? :smile:
 
berkeman said:
What are your thoughts so far? :smile:
Well, in terms of functionality I guess the method works since I managed to create a temporary magnet out of the wrench that in turn influenced the iron nail. Pros with this method, I guess, would be that it is easy to perform. The cons would be that it's only a temporary magnet. (Not sure about this part, need help to elaborate my answer).
As for alternative methods, I read somewhere that you can use a hammer to hit the Nail with, in order to make it magnetic.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
VitaminK said:
Well, in terms of functionality I guess the method works since I managed to create a temporary magnet out of the wrench that in turn influenced the iron nail. Pros with this method, I guess, would be that it is easy to perform. The cons would be that it's only a temporary magnet. (Not sure about this part, need help to elaborate my answer).
As for alternative methods, I read somewhere that you can use a hammer to hit the Nail with, in order to make it magnetic.
Good thoughts so far. I'm not sure about the hitting it with a hammer part, but it seems to sound a little familiar. Google can help to validate that, and to tell you the level of magnetization attainable with that method if it really does work (I suspect the level is pretty low).

And as for the method in your experiment, I agree that the level of magnetization would be low. I used to run a magnetic pole along the length of a sewing needle when I was a kid to make a cork+needle compass by floating the needle and cork in a small dish of water. That was pretty cool. I think the rubbing (in one direction) technique will give you a higher level of magnetization than just a single touch on one end -- you could do some Google searching and reading to try to see if you can figure out what the relative magnitudes of the magnetizations would be with those two methods.

You should also do some reading about how real magnets are magnetized (most likely using electromagnetic coils), and see what the levels of magnetization can be achieved with different materials and those best techniques. Be sure to look at the quantitative numbers for the Br and Hc (look those up) and also the units that are associated with those quantities.

Finally, be a little careful magnetizing metal tools (either on purpose or accidentally). Some tools still work fine/better when magnetized, but others can have problems that come up when they are magnetized. Can you say which tools you can think of that would work a little better when magnetized, and which ones you definitely would prefer not to have magnetized? Which of those two categories would your Allen wrench fall into? :wink:
 
Last edited:
How do you de-magnetize the allen wrench? There are ways using magnets ...and not using magnets. Many useful questions.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...