Magnitude and direction of acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnitude and direction of acceleration while sliding towards home plate after reaching a speed of 5.9 m/s. The calculated acceleration is 5.36 m/s², but clarification is needed on its direction, which could be toward home plate or third base. To determine the distance slid, participants discuss using the equation d = vt + 1/2at², acknowledging the need to consider the final velocity as zero. Alternative methods, such as using the relationship V² = 2ax, are also suggested for calculating distance. Understanding the relationships between distance, time, and acceleration is emphasized as crucial for solving the problem effectively.
bumblebee
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
1. You are going toward home plate at speed of 5.9 m/s when you hit the dirt. You slide for 1.1 s just reaching the plate as you stop.
a)What is the magnitude and direction of your acceleration?
b) How far did you slide?
I got 5.36 m/s^2 for the acceleration. Not sure if I did this right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bumblebee said:
1. You are going toward home plate at speed of 5.9 m/s when you hit the dirt. You slide for 1.1 s just reaching the plate as you stop.
a)What is the magnitude and direction of your acceleration?
b) How far did you slide?
I got 5.36 m/s^2 for the acceleration. Not sure if I did this right.

Welcome to PF.

That looks OK for magnitude. Which direction was the acceleration? Toward the plate or toward 3rd base?

Now how far was the slide. Do you have an equation that would give you the distance if you know the acceleration and time?
 
Thanks, LowlyPion.

Is it d=vt + 1/2at^2?

I'm getting all these equations confused.
 
bumblebee said:
Thanks, LowlyPion.

Is it d=vt + 1/2at^2?

I'm getting all these equations confused.

That works as long as you realize that you are coming to a stop, so velocity will be 0.

Alternatively since you also know velocity you could use the relationship that

V2 = 2 a x

That should yield the same result.

It's important to understand that the relationships between distance, time, acceleration can be reworked in a number of ways to express things in terms that you may have directly to find what you need.

This link may provide you with a list of the equations as a brief reference:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=905663&postcount=2
 
Last edited:
Thanks! This helps!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top