Magnitude and direction of electric field at point P

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the electrostatic potential and electric field at point P due to an electric dipole. The total potential at point P is derived as Vtot = kq(1/(x+a) - 1/(x-a)), simplifying to Vtot = (2kqa)/(x^2). The magnitude and direction of the electric field E are determined by taking the gradient of the potential function, which points along the x-axis toward the nearest charge. For points along the x-axis, the electric field direction is toward (a, 0) for x > 0 and toward (-a, 0) for x < 0. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between potential, electric field, and their respective directions in the context of dipoles.
Ryomega
Messages
67
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An electric dipole is defined as two point charges separated by distance L.
Consider point P with coordinates (x,0).
A dipole along the x-axis is separated by distance a from the origin. q- is closer to point P
Find:

1) Electrostatic potential due to dipole at point P
2) Magnitude and direction of electric field E at point P in terms of dipole moment and distance x

Homework Equations



V = k\frac{q}{r}

The Attempt at a Solution



1) Vtot = V+q + V-q

= kq(\frac{1}{x+a} - \frac{1}{x-a})

=\frac{2kqa}{x^2}

2) I know that taking the divergence of \frac{2kqa}{x^2} will give a scalar. Is this divergence going to be \frac{d}{dx}? How do I go about getting the magnitude and direction from there?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The value of the gradient is the magnitude of the vector. Since both poles are on the x-axis and your given point is (x, 0), the vector will point along the x-axis to the nearest pole. That means that for x> 0 it points toward (a, 0) and for x< 0, it points toward (-a, 0).

More generally, if the point could be any point in the xy-plane, (x, y), rather than just (x, 0), the potential function would be
\phi(x,y)= \frac{kq}{\sqrt{(x-a)^2+ y^2}}+ \frac{kq}{\sqrt{(x+a)^2a+ y^2}}
and the force vector the gradient of that:
\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial x}\vec{i}+ \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial y}\vec{j}
 
Ah, I see. Thank you
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top