Magnitude of acceleration of a stationary mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration of a stationary block subjected to an upward force at an angle, factoring in different coefficients of static and kinetic friction. The initial calculations for the forces in the x and y directions were performed using trigonometric functions of the applied force. The normal force was incorrectly derived, leading to confusion regarding the static friction and resulting acceleration. Participants pointed out errors in the approach, particularly in the calculation of the normal force and the relationship between static friction and the applied force. The correct understanding of these forces is crucial for determining the block's acceleration accurately.
peaceandlove
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An initially stationary block of mass m lies on the floor. A force of magnitude 0.500mg is then applied at upward angle θ = 20°. What is the magnitude of the acceleration of the block across the floor if (a) μs = 0.620 and μk = 0.520 and (b) μs = 0.410 and μk = 0.310?


Homework Equations


Fx=.5mgcos20
Fy=.5mgsin20

The Attempt at a Solution


I first found my force in the x and y directions by using: Fx=Fcos(theta) = 0.5mgcos(theta)
Fy=Fsin(theta) = 0.5mgsin(theta). Since I had to find the normal force (in order to find out the static friction) i used: Fnet,y=may => Fn-Fg-Fy=may and since its not accelerating in the y direction ay=0 making: Fn=Fg+Fy => mg+0.5mgsin(theta), then i found the max static friction by using: Mu*normal force when i compared my max static friction to my Force in the x direction (since that's the only direction its moving), my static friction was less than my Fx, making a=0. And then i did that again for the second set of numbers for part b, got the same thing, a=0, but got it wrong. So i don't know what to do from there.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
mg acts in the downward direction. Take its component perpendicular and parallel to the inclined plane. Perpendicular component will be the normal reaction. From this find the frictional force which is along the inclined plane. Now porceed.
 
Sorry. Ignore the post #2.
Since force is acted in the upward direction with angle 20 degree with horizontal, mg and Fy must be in the opposite direction. So Fn must be mg - Fy
 
Last edited:
peaceandlove: Although your approach is currently incorrect, you got the answer for part (a) correct, right? Only your answer for part (b) was wrong, true?

Fn is not equal to m*g + 0.5*m*g*sin(theta). Try again. You also said, "My static friction was less than my Fx, making a = 0." Are you sure this statement is correct?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top