What is the Relationship Between Force Magnitude and Length in a Scale?

AI Thread Summary
The relationship between force magnitude and length in a scale is that force is represented as a vector, which includes both magnitude and direction. When using a graphical method to represent forces, the length of the line corresponds to the magnitude of the force according to a chosen scale. A shorter length indicates a smaller force, as the scale dictates how force is represented visually. The resultant force is determined by connecting forces head to tail, forming a parallelogram to visualize the net effect. Ultimately, the scale used is flexible and can be adjusted based on convenience for representation.
goldfish9776
Messages
310
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In this notes , I was told that the f2 is min when the length is the shrtest ( when f2 is prependicular to fr ... why ? Is the length represent the magnitude of the force ? the shorter the length , the smaller is the force ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • IMG_20150910_173546[1].jpg
    IMG_20150910_173546[1].jpg
    47 KB · Views: 536
Physics news on Phys.org
goldfish9776 said:

Homework Statement


In this notes , I was told that the f2 is min when the length is the shrtest ( when f2 is prependicular to fr ... why ? Is the length represent the magnitude of the force ? the shorter the length , the smaller is the force ?

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution

You know reading scaled drawings?
Force actually is a vector. Vector means any physical quantities having magnitude and direction. The solution in the picture you posted is actually a graphical method.
It is the quantification of force scaled to a unit length that corresponds the magnitude of force, and its direction using angles with respect to a frame of reference.
The graphical method is just like drawing a Parallelogram. Head to tail connection of acting forces with the angles of their respective orientation. The resultant Force or the net force is just the line drawn from the tail of the origin(where the first force is drawn) to the head of the last force, which you might as well measure the angle of its orientation by using a protractor.
 
Last edited:
Legolaz said:
You know reading scaled drawings?
Force actually is a vector. Vector means any physical quantities having magnitude and direction. The solution in the picture you posted is actually a graphical method.
It is the quantification of force scaled to a unit length that corresponds the magnitude of force, and its direction using angles with respect to a frame of reference.
The graphical method is just like drawing a Parallelogram. Head to tail connection of acting forces with the angles of their respective orientation. The resultant Force or the net force is just the line drawn from the tail of the origin(where the first force is drawn) to the head of the last force.
The shorter the length, the smaller is the force?
 
Yap, it's in a scale my dear. Say, 10 N force, when I have to plot it on the paper, I'd make it as 10 mm length, that is if my scale is 1N/mm. This is for the reason that I can easily accommodate it inside the paper size.

You decide on the scale, whichever is convenient for you. You could either use 1N/inch or 1 N/cm. It depends on what you like.
 
  • Like
Likes goldfish9776
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top