Making a square with point charges (alternative solutions)

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the work required to arrange point charges at the vertices of a square, the recommended method is to assemble the charges one at a time, starting with the first charge, which requires zero work. The work for subsequent charges depends on the electric potential created by the already placed charges. The total work is the sum of the individual energies calculated based on the distances between the charges. Alternative methods, such as multiplying the work for a single charge or using the potential at the center of the square, are not valid for determining the work done in this context. The discussion emphasizes the importance of accurately accounting for the electric potential as charges are added.
narfarnst
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate how much work it takes to make a square of side length A with point charges (all of charge q) at each vertex.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I know one way to do it. (find the difference in potential for each point and then go from there to find the work).
But I have two other ways that I'm not sure if they'll work or not.

First way
Since you'll have to do more work each time to overcome the newly added charges, can you just find the work it takes to place one charge and then multiply by six? (Because for each charge you have to do that much more work. i.e, 1 charge is 1W, 2 charges is 2W, 3 charges is 3W, so total charge would be (3*2*1)W=6W... or would it be (3+2+1)W=6W?).

Second Way
Can I just find the potential at the center of the finished square and use that final potential to find work?

Also, am I correct in assuming that because there are initially no charges (and no surroundings to speak of) the first charges needs 0 work?


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The best way to do this is to assemble the charges one at a time. The work to bring in the first charge is zero. For the second charge it is kq2/A. For the third charge it is qV, where V is the electric potential at the location of the third charge due to the presence of the other two charges, and so on. Add all the works to get the total. I wouldn't trust any other method.

You are correct in assuming that initially there are no charges. That's why it costs no work to bring in the first charge.
 
This is more of an accounting problem, no really a whole lot of math.

say you have charges oriented in this formation at the end
1 2

3 4

and they all have an equal distance of d

what is the energy to bring the first charge in?

1 -- all by itself

well its zero right. so U1 = 0

Now bring in charge 2

1 2

now we have work being done. -- the potential will be U2 = kq^2/d

now bring in charge 3

1 2

3 -- we are being affect by charge 1 and charge 2

U3 = Kq^2/d + kq^2/(d*sqrt(2))

Kq^2/d - being the potential due to charge 1 and 3
kq^2/(d*sqrt(2)) - being the potential due to charge 3 and 2, d*sqrt(2) is the distance between them

and lastly add the final charge

1 2

3 4do you see the logic here?

once your done you sum up all of your energy
 
Yes, I get that. That's the method I already know how to do (thanks, by the way. I hadn't actually worked it out yet, but I knew how :) ).
I'm asking if there is an easier way to do the problem, namely, one of the two ways I suggested.
Thanks.
 
>>Can I just find the potential at the center of the finished square and use that final potential to find work?

Oh alright :) well this is potential would be different in that scenario

that would be what the potential is at a point in the center of the square, not what work it took to build the square by pulling charges from infinity

the potential at the center of the square:

4*kq^2/(d*sqrt(2)/2) -- assuming all charges are the same

to build the square it would be :

(kq^2/d) * (4 + sqrt(2))
 
A-ha!
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top