Mass attached to spring on frictionless table

cflemer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An ideal spring of an un-stretched length 0.10 m is placed horizontally on a frictionless table. One end of the spring is fixed and the other end is attached to block of mass M = 10 kg. The 10 kg block is also attached to a massless string that passes over a small frictionless pulley. A block of mass m = 2 kg hangs from the other end of the string. When this spring-and-blocks system is in equilibrium, the length of the spring is .20 m.

Calculate tension in the string.

Calculate the force constant of the spring.

(there is a diagram, but it is complicated and I don't know how i would get it on here)


Homework Equations


F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

cflemer said:
An ideal spring of an un-stretched length 0.10 m is placed horizontally on a frictionless table. One end of the spring is fixed and the other end is attached to block of mass M = 10 kg. The 10 kg block is also attached to a massless string that passes over a small frictionless pulley. A block of mass m = 2 kg hangs from the other end of the string. When this spring-and-blocks system is in equilibrium, the length of the spring is .20 m.

Calculate tension in the string.

Calculate the force constant of the spring.

Hi cflemer !Welcome to PF! :smile:

(there's no need for a diagram … your description is fine :smile:)

Show us what you've tried, and where you're stuck, and then we'll know how to help. :wink:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top