Mass lost in a single fusion reaction

AI Thread Summary
In the D + T fusion reaction, the mass lost is approximately 0.0283 atomic mass units, equivalent to about 4.7 x 10^-29 kg. This mass loss is related to the energy produced, calculated using Einstein's equation E=mc², with the reaction yielding 17.6 MeV. All of the mass is not converted to energy, as a helium nucleus is formed in the process. The mass defect can be calculated using the formula m(D) + m(T) - m(4He) - m(n). Accurate experimental values can be found on reliable physics resources for verification.
eXmag
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
How much mass is lost in a single D + T= 4He fusion reaction? And is all of the mass lost converted to energy or just some? The mass lost can be converted to energy using e=mc2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Obviously, all of the mass is not converted to energy, since a helium nucleus is produced.

Your reaction equation is also slightly off:

D + T = 4He + n

The energy produced is 17.6 MeV, which is equivalent to about 18.9*10-3 atomic mass units.
 
I don't think you understand what I am asking. I am getting roughly around 4.7x10^-29 kg mass lost but I wanted to confirm this. You can convert that to atomic mass units if you wish but I prefer in kg. Thanks
 
which is about 0.0283u of mass lost
 
m(D) + m(T) - m(4He) - m(n) = mass defect and it will be equal to energy produced in the reaction. If you are getting something different, check for errors.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top