Mass of Hydrogen needed to determine lifetime of proton

MxwllsPersuasns
Messages
97
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The current limit on the proton’s lifetime is determined by observing a large body of water for a long time and noticing that no one of the hydrogen nuclei in H2O have decayed. Assuming that the experiment making this measurement has been going on for 10 years, how many tons of water are needed to set the constraint on the lifetime of the proton τ > 1034 years?

Homework Equations



N = N0e-t/τ

The Attempt at a Solution



For this I would think we would use this equation to then find the amount of protons needed to make -t/τ = -(10)/(1034 and then from that figure out the number of protons in H2O and then figure out how many molecules then multiply by the molecular weight. Am I on the right track?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That will work. You don't even need the full exponential function as the observation time is so tiny compared to the lifetime.

If you expect one decay (at a given lifetime value) and observe no decay, that is not sufficient to rule out this value (you could have been just a bit unlucky), but that is probably a technical detail you don't have to worry about here.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top