B Mass transfer between neutron stars in a binary pair

AI Thread Summary
Mass transfer between neutron stars in a binary system can lead to an increase in the spin rate of the receiving star due to the conservation of angular momentum. When matter spirals in at high velocity and impacts at an angle, it contributes significant momentum perpendicular to the neutron star's radius. The overall angular momentum of the system, which includes the individual spins of both stars and their orbital motion, remains constant during mass transfer. As mass is added to a neutron star, its radius decreases due to gravitational compression, which can enhance its spin rate. Understanding these dynamics reveals the complex interplay between mass, momentum, and angular velocity in neutron star systems.
Andy DS
Messages
21
Reaction score
3
TL;DR Summary
Conservation of rotational momentum question
When we read about the mass transfer between neutron star pairs in a binary system, how is it that the one receiving the matter can increase its spin rate. Adding mass to a spinning object ought to slow due to conservation of momentum. Where does the energy come from?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It comes from the falling matter. The matter doesn't fall straight down, but comes spiraling in and hits at an angle and at a very, very high velocity. Thus the vector component of the velocity and momentum perpendicular to the neutron star's radius is significant.
 
There's a few aspects at play here. The big important one I'll hint at without actually giving away the answer.

Firstly, the overall angular momentum is conserved. Suppose you have two stars, A and B. Either of which can be a neutron star. In a simplified model, there are three (3) "sources" of angular momentum. There's the spinning of star A on its own, the spinning of star B on its own, and the orbital angular momentum of two stars as they orbit around each other. So even if you transfer mass from one to the other, the total angular momentum must remain constant (just be sure to add the angular momentum's together in vector form; remember angular momentum is a vector).

Now let's step back for a moment, and just concentrate on a single star (forget about the angular momentum of the other two "sources" for now). It's useful here to remember the ice-skater analogy. When an ice-skater pulls her hands in, decreasing her effective radius, her angular speed increases, right?

Now here's the tricky bit: What happens to a neutron star when mass is added to it. Does its radius increase or decrease? If you don't know, you may want to look this up. The answer may surprise you. :wink:
 
Last edited:
collinsmark said:
Now here's the tricky bit: What happens to a neutron star when mass is added to it. Does its radius increase or decrease? If you don't know, you may want to look this up. The answer may surprise you. :wink:
Ooh, I didn't know this either. I thought it was solely due to the matter falling onto the star.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
Oh right, so it's the angular momentum of the whole system which is preserved which includes the co-orbital momentum.
Thanks I hadn't taken that into account.
And without looking it up I can imagine that the radius of the neutron star decreases with added mass as it would help to compress the object due to its immense gravity, thus helping it to spin-up.
 
  • Like
Likes collinsmark
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top