Resistor Math Problem: Finding Equivalent Resistance in Series and Parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ithryndil
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resistors
AI Thread Summary
Two resistors in series have an equivalent resistance of 744.7 Ω, while in parallel, their equivalent resistance is 130.4 Ω. To find the resistance of each resistor, the equations for series and parallel configurations are applied. The first equation gives R1 = Reqs - R2, which is substituted into the parallel equation. The resulting quadratic equation can be solved for R2, leading to two real solutions, confirming the calculations are correct. Utilizing a calculator program for solving quadratics can help avoid input errors and streamline the process.
Ithryndil
Messages
142
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two resistors connected in series have an equivalent resistance of 744.7 Ω. When they are connected in parallel, their equivalent resistance is 130.4 Ω. Find the resistance of each resistor.
Ω (small resistance)
Ω (large resistance)


Homework Equations


Req = R1 + R2 for Series.
1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 for Parallel.



The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I began by solving one for R1 and plugging it into the other...

If I solve the first one I get R1 = Req - R2. Let's call Req, Reqs for Equivalent Resistance in series. Let's call Reqp the Equivalent Resistance in parallel.

So I plug into the other one:

1/Reqp = 1/ (Reqs - R2) + 1/R2

Messing around I am able to get:
R2Reqs - R2^2 = Reqs*Reqp However when I graph if there is no sign change... I've done it a few times so I don't think it's my algebra.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Try to solve the quadratic equation.
It seems OK to me. Actually I've solved it and it has two real solutions.
You did OK.
Good luck.
 


Hey,
yeah when i used quadratic eq. it seemed to work out fine.

I learned resistors with the equation (R1*R2)/(R1+R2) which is the same thing simplified, but i always find htis one easier.

Anyway, it seems like you just about had it, just needed to finish it off with the eq and you would have it.
 


Ithryndil said:

Homework Statement


Two resistors connected in series have an equivalent resistance of 744.7 Ω. When they are connected in parallel, their equivalent resistance is 130.4 Ω. Find the resistance of each resistor.
Ω (small resistance)
Ω (large resistance)

Homework Equations


Req = R1 + R2 for Series.
1/Req = 1/R1 + 1/R2 for Parallel.

The Attempt at a Solution



Ok, so I began by solving one for R1 and plugging it into the other...

If I solve the first one I get R1 = Req - R2. Let's call Req, Reqs for Equivalent Resistance in series. Let's call Reqp the Equivalent Resistance in parallel.

So I plug into the other one:

1/Reqp = 1/ (Reqs - R2) + 1/R2

Messing around I am able to get:
R2Reqs - R2^2 = Reqs*Reqp However when I graph if there is no sign change... I've done it a few times so I don't think it's my algebra.

Your equation is ok, but you need to solve the quadratic, and since the 4ac term is positive you should have a real result.
 


Bah, it must have been a stupid graphic error on my calculator. I knew I needed to solve the quadratic and must have just goofed when inputting on my calculator to graph and then find where it intersects y = 0. Thanks.
 


I'm guessing that by the way you are talking, you have either a TI-83, or maybe a more advanced. If you are only using an 83 or 84, which is what most people have, there's a very easy quadratic program that you can put in there, (like write yourself) so you don't even need a cord to hook it up to your PC. I made one for mine, and it really comes in handy, because not only its quicker, but then it lessens any stupid mistakes you might make, (like accidently not putting a negative, or having to deal with a window issue for graphing).

So this isn't the exact same as the one i made, but it definately works, just might be one step more than needed. http://www.math.montana.edu/math105/QuadProg.html

Good luck!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top