Mathematical problem in electrial/magnetic fields

Niltiac

Homework Statement


A charged particle moves in a region of space where there is a uniform magnetic field B (in the z direction say,) and a uniform electric field E in the yz plane. Write the equations of motion for the particle. Then solve them, taking for initial conditions (at t=0) x=y=z=0; xdot=xdot0, ydot=zdot=0. Show that there is a drift velocity equal to Ey/B in the positive x direction. If Ey=0, then the orbit becomes a spiral about a line parallel to the z axis.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I've got one equation of motion:
dV/dt=q/m[(Ex+VyB)xhat + (Ey-vxB)yhat + Ezzhat] However the problem asks for equations (plural) and I'm only finding this one.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Niltiac said:

The Attempt at a Solution


I've got one equation of motion:
dV/dt=q/m[(Ex+VyB)xhat + (Ey-vxB)yhat + Ezzhat] However the problem asks for equations (plural) and I'm only finding this one.

You have written one vector equation that is equivalent to three scalar equations, one for each direction. Write down these equations separately.
 
So the equations would be:
dV/dtx= q/m(Ex+VyB)
dV/dty=q/m(Ey-VxB)
dV/dtz=qEz/m
?
Also, my instinct says that Ex should be zero since the electric field exists in the yz plane. Is this correct?
 
Yes, this seems OK.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top