'Mathematically Similar' Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeldaspurpose
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Igcse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on understanding how volume and surface area change when scaling an object, specifically when its dimensions are doubled. Participants clarify that if the volume ratio of two mathematically similar objects is 64:27, the surface area ratio will differ, and they suggest exploring the relationship between height and volume. A comparison is made using the example of an adult and a newborn to illustrate the concept of scaling. The conversation also touches on the importance of clear presentation in homework submissions. Ultimately, the focus is on grasping the principles of mathematical similarity in geometry.
zeldaspurpose
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


314476b.jpg


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried cross multiplying but obviously that is not the case. These types of questions are the ones I always lose marks in. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do volume and surface area change if you make an object twice as long/high/thick?
Based on that, what is the scale factor in your problem?
 
I'm not sure how to find out, I'm really sorry. All I know:

volume of larger container : volume of smaller container
3456 : 1458
Simplified:
64 : 27

Which is where I got stuck. I don't know what to do from there.
 
If working with weird flask shapes makes you uncomfortable, try doing the same with two cubes. As long as the two bodies are mathematically similar, it shouldn't matter to us. See if that helps.
 
  • Like
Likes Merlin3189
zeldaspurpose said:
I'm not sure how to find out, I'm really sorry. All I know:

volume of larger container : volume of smaller container
3456 : 1458
Simplified:
64 : 27

Which is where I got stuck. I don't know what to do from there.

Another hint:

If the ratio of volumes is 64:27, and if you think the ratio of surface areas should be 64:27, do you think the ratio of heights should be 64:27 as well?
 
PeroK said:
Another hint:

If the ratio of volumes is 64:27, and if you think the ratio of surface areas should be 64:27, do you think the ratio of heights should be 64:27 as well?
And to make an extreme example: an adult human has about 3 to 4 times the height of a newborn baby. How would an adult look like with 3 to 4 times the mass of a newborn baby?
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja
And once you get the principle, noticed that some arithmetical simplifications are offered in the numbers given you. (They could even point you the way, but not unambiguously.)
 
mfb said:
And to make an extreme example: an adult human has about 3 to 4 times the height of a newborn baby. How would an adult look like with 3 to 4 times the mass of a newborn baby?

God @mfb ! Now that visual isn't leaving my head for the next two hours.

I hope the OP understood.
 
  • Like
Likes zeldaspurpose and mfb
  • #10
CrazyNinja said:
God @mfb ! Now that visual isn't leaving my head for the next two hours.
I thought about using the opposite direction but that didn't make it better.
 
  • Like
Likes CrazyNinja
Back
Top