Matrix representation of a quantum system

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 2K views
whatisgoingon
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to find the matrix system of Sx, Sy , and Sz using the given information:
190899[/ATTACH]']
MR5aRwH.jpg

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


for attempting Sx:
Ignoring the ket at the bottom, I would get Sx|+> = +ħ/2[[0,1],[1,0]]
but my question here is, does the ket at the bottom(the |±>x = 1/√2 [|+> ± |->] affect the matrix?
because the matrix form of the ket will be 1/√2([1,1]).
With that said, would I have to insert that into the Sx equation? Giving me the matrix representation of 190901[/ATTACH]']
7qaYfVU.jpg
 

Attachments

  • MR5aRwH.jpg
    MR5aRwH.jpg
    9.3 KB · Views: 521
  • 7qaYfVU.jpg
    7qaYfVU.jpg
    2.1 KB · Views: 417
Physics news on Phys.org
whatisgoingon said:
Ignoring the ket at the bottom, I would get Sx|+> = +ħ/2[[0,1],[1,0]]
That doesn't make sense. The result of an operator on a ket is a ket, so it can be represented as a vector, not a matrix. And how can you obtain that result without considering "the ket at the bottom?"

What is the Dirac representation of a matrix element?
 
DrClaude said:
That doesn't make sense. The result of an operator on a ket is a ket, so it can be represented as a vector, not a matrix.
whoops, I meant Sx is represented as ħ/2 [[0,1],[1,0]].
DrClaude said:
And how can you obtain that result without considering "the ket at the bottom?
I was under the assumption that the ket |+> = [1,0] and that the ket at the bottom didn't affect it. From your response I guess, it does affect it.

Also isn't the dirac representation just the bra and ket? <+|A|+>
 
whatisgoingon said:
whoops, I meant Sx is represented as ħ/2 [[0,1],[1,0]].
Ok. But, still, how did you get that matrix?

whatisgoingon said:
I was under the assumption that the ket |+> = [1,0] and that the ket at the bottom didn't affect it. From your response I guess, it does affect it.
You have to distinguish between ##| \pm \rangle## and ##| \pm \rangle_x##

whatisgoingon said:
Also isn't the dirac representation just the bra and ket?
Yes. What is a single matrix element of the representation of an operator in bracket notation?