Matrix with repeated eigenvalues

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the values of x that yield repeated eigenvalues for a given matrix. The characteristic equation derived is (\lambda - 3)((\lambda - x)^2 - 4) = 0, indicating that 3 is a solution. To achieve a double root, either 3 must satisfy the equation (\lambda - x)^2 - 4 = 0, leading to x = 2 or 3, or the second equation must have a double root, which is impossible since its discriminant is never zero. The conversation highlights the theoretical challenges in handling eigenvalues with algebraic multiplicity greater than one. The conclusion emphasizes the need for a clearer understanding of the relationship between algebraic and geometric multiplicities in this context.
Shambles
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
The question is asking for what values of x will the matrix have at least one repeated eigenvalue (algebraic multiplicity of 2 or greater). The matrix is
| 3 0 0 |
| 0 x 2 | So naturally a normal attempt to find the eigenvalue in a question with only intergers
| 0 2 x | I would continue with:

| \lambda-3 0 0 |
| 0 \lambda-x -2|
| 0 -2 \lambda-x|

And then finding the determinant would continue with (\lambda-3)(\lambda-x)(\lambda-x) - (-2)(-2)(\lambda-3) etc...

Except with 2 unknown variable it inevitably becomes a problem that I run into with more theoretical questions vs questions dealing only with numbers. As far as I know an eigenvalue with an algebraic multiplicity of >1 doesn't even have a geometric significance. Clearly I am approaching this entire question from the wrong angle and could use a push in the right direction if anyone is so able. Muchly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I don't see why you need to be that theoretical!

The characteristic equation for the eigenvalues is obviously (\lambda- 3)((\lambda- x)^2- 4)= 0. 3 is an obvious solution to that so in order to have a double root, either 3 is a root of (\lambda- x)^2- 4= 0 or that equation has a double root. If 3 is a root then we must have (3- x)^2- 4= x^2- 6x+ 5= (x- 3)(x- 2)= 0 so that x= 2 or 3. If (\lambda- x)^2- 4= \lambda^2- 2x\lambda+ x^2- 4= 0 has a double root, then its discriminant must be 0: 4x^2- 4(x^2- 4)= 4 is never 0 so that can't happen.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top