Max Temperature Peak: Global vs Local Energy Source

AI Thread Summary
When a localized energy source, such as a laser, heats a system at a global temperature, it creates a maximum temperature peak. The change in temperature from this peak to the global temperature can vary based on the global temperature itself. Increasing the global temperature while keeping the energy input constant does not guarantee the same delta temperature. This is due to the fact that heat capacity and heat conductivity are not constant across different temperatures. As the global temperature rises, the change from global to maximum temperature is likely to be greater, influenced by the system's thermal properties.
porcupine6789
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Ok, so say I have a system at a global temperature, I add an energy source (laser in this case) and it heats the system in a localized area. This leads to a maximum temperature peak in the system. Then you can get out a change in temperature from this maximum to the global. OK, now my question is say in increase the global temperature and keep the power source the same, would I expect to find the delta temperature to be the same for small global temperatures, or would I expect to find that the change from global to max is greater when the global temperature is greater. Hopefully that made some sort of sense.
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If you don't mind me rephrasing it, I think you're asking:
"Does adding a given amount of heat to a system always raise the temperature by the same amount? (Locally before equilibration and globally after it's equilibrated)"

The answer would be no. The heat capacity (change of temperature per unit of heat energy) is not usually constant with temperature, nor is the heat conductivity (which together with the heat capacity would determine the maximum temperature peak during heating).
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top